Dimensity 9000 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (with Mali-G710 MP10 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8400
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~53%)
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 1504K
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 3050 MHz)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1504467
1948428
CPU 546692 623766
GPU 290175 596540
Memory 237462 331200
UX 430138 396922
Total score 1504467 1948428
Samples [14 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 170.6 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 120.5 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.2 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 115.4 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 140.3 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.7 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 38.9 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 12 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 8.55 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 4.42 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.3 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1296 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 775 1346
Stability 63% 86%
Graphics test 6 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 5948
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Section 1 - 25 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2332 -
Stability 71% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14034
Video editing score - 6661
Data manipulation score - 13175
Photo editing score - 23584
Writing score - 17637
Phones tested - 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu1500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu1500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu1584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu1542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu1561642
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Vyx)AnTuTu2023750
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Alex)AnTuTu2004654
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Siam)AnTuTu2105375
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (ras)AnTuTu1916912
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Zulkarnaen)AnTuTu1978838

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9000 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3050 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP10 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 848 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 10 7
Shading units 64 128
Total shaders 640 896
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 590 MediaTek NPU 880

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3750 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 60 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3200 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7000 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2021 December 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6983 MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page - MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
18 (14.3%)
108 (85.7%)
Total votes: 126

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 9000, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Pankaj June 16, 2026 at 07:44 PM
I don't know why they not give wifi 7 in 8400.
0 Reply
Avatar
if u read this. u gay May 9, 2025 at 06:34 PM
bro what? 8400 win 9000 lose?
+11 Reply
Avatar
Zo Ey May 17, 2025 at 02:00 AM
Thats 8400 Ultra vs 9000
0 Reply
Avatar
Gaylord Focker June 9, 2025 at 08:48 AM
That is "TECNOLOGIA"
+3 Reply
Avatar
Naval December 3, 2025 at 03:09 PM
The D9000 from 2022 bro, it's been 3 years, almost 4 even
+5 Reply