Dimensity 9400 vs Tensor G4

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 86%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 1519K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~71%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 3100 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2825187
1519937
CPU 900074 536742
GPU 972096 414930
Memory 345330 215572
UX 607687 352693
Total score 2825187 1519937
Samples [72 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2797
1707
Multi-Core Score
8767
4431
Asset compression 344.4 MB/sec 177.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 251 pages/sec 134 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 258.4 Mpixels/sec 157 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 209.7 images/sec 122 images/sec
HDR 267.4 Mpixels/sec 128.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 30.9 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Photo processing 84.4 images/sec 39.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.3 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 22 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21574
8744
Background blur 43 images/sec 13.4 images/sec
Face detection 19.8 images/sec 8.51 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.71 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 73.3 Gpixels/sec 26.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3456.3 FPS 1273.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 17 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2371
1049
Score 2371 1049
Stability 61% 84%
Graphics test 18 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 10747 -
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 46 FPS -
Section 2 42 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 6272 -
Graphics test 37 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
15020
13174
Web score 14420 10521
Video editing score 6211 7569
Data manipulation score 16192 14718
Photo editing score 30985 21074
Writing score 19569 15880
Phones tested 6 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 111423579
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu 111626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu 111723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)Geekbench 6 GPU8744

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 and Tensor G4

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3620 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 12 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 940 MHz
Pipelines 12 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 896
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 1684.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5400c
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2024 August 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA GS401 (S5P9875)
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
77 (89.5%)
9 (10.5%)
Total votes: 86

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G4 and Dimensity 9400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Indian guy October 25, 2024 at 11:51 AM
For some reason, single core of android phones isn't as good as that of IOS.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Randy chan August 15, 2024 at 03:06 AM
Looks like Google's newly released Tensor G4 gets destroyed easily by Media Tek's upcoming dimensity 9400 in performance benchmarks. Is this even a contest? I think not.
+15 Reply