Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700 – what's better?

Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700

Helio G95
VS
Dimensity 700
Helio G95
Dimensity 700

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v10
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 10 score – 406K vs 388K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 700
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Helio G95
vs
Dimensity 700

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G95 +5%
406952
Dimensity 700
388693
CPU 121831 134060
GPU 105016 51872
Memory 78906 97222
UX 104719 106247
Total score 406952 388693
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G95
632
Dimensity 700 +12%
707
Multi-Core Score
Helio G95
1735
Dimensity 700 +3%
1780
Asset compression 93.5 MB/sec 95.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46 pages/sec 47.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 58.3 Mpixels/sec 66.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.5 images/sec 33.9 images/sec
HDR 55.2 Mpixels/sec 56.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 4.91 images/sec 4.22 images/sec
Photo processing 14.5 images/sec 15.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.47 Mpixels/sec 2.64 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G95 +56%
1949
Dimensity 700
1246
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Helio G95 +23%
1482
Dimensity 700
1201
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 8 FPS 7 FPS
Score 1482 1201

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 51 FPS
[Low]		 51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]		 37 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 57 FPS
[Low]		 59 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[High]		 52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 27 FPS
[Low]		 34 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 52 FPS
[Ultra]		 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Realme 7
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Dimensity 700

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2050 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 12 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP4 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
Execution units 4 2
Shading units 36 64
Total shaders 144 128
FLOPS 259.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
Max size 10 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Yes
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 November 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6785V/CD MT6833V/ZA
Official page MediaTek Helio G95 official site MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3526 (36.5%)
6125 (63.5%)
Total votes: 9651

Related Comparisons

1. Helio G95 vs Snapdragon 732G
2. Helio G95 vs Snapdragon 680
3. Helio G95 vs Helio G99
4. Helio G95 vs Helio G96
5. Helio G95 vs Snapdragon 720G
6. Dimensity 700 vs Snapdragon 480
7. Dimensity 700 vs Snapdragon 680
8. Dimensity 700 vs Helio G99
9. Dimensity 700 vs Helio G96
10. Dimensity 700 vs Dimensity 6020
Compare other chipsets (160+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Helio G95, or ask any questions
Avatar
ItzRandom 22 February 2023 22:21
These chips are pretty good. Happens to use both poco M3 pro and Redmi note 10s, both perform so well 👍👍
+10 Reply
Avatar
Drake 14 February 2023 23:36
I think battery management and optimization are far more important for a phone. I also play games like pubg, mlbb, and genshin. 1 thing I don't like when playing is the phone heating issue, it makes my hands wet when playing, then that fast battery consumption its very bad for the phone to use while charging. The GPU is the least I consider as long as I can play comfortably. G95 is just a bit higher GPU score but D700 has better battery optimization and heat control since it's 7mn only compare to 12mn G95. so overall my bote goes to D700.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Hemanth 30 July 2021 14:29
If you want 5g then go for Med 700nm otherwise Med g95 far better. No one can tell when 5g sim's will come in market.
+81 Reply
Avatar
Joshua 01 January 2023 11:42
Lol, they're here & I get 350 mb/s dl & 100+ mb/s upload in good ol' South Carolina, using by far the most reliable American 5g architecture, T-Mobile towers, on my UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G. Wish I'd got the MAX version with dimensity 900 though🤷. My 5g is over 10x faster than my ATT Wi-Fi 💯
+1 Reply
Avatar
NameChanged 11 June 2021 21:38
I think the 7nm architecture of the Dimensity 700 does the trick here. 7nm chips are going to be efficient compared to the 12nm ones.
+109 Reply
Promotion
EnglishРусский