Helio G95 vs Dimensity 700

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Performs 42% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 535K vs 515K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 700
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G95 +4%
535127
515647
CPU 198562 185796
GPU 57845 44366
Memory 113958 120419
UX 164762 165066
Total score 535127 515647
Samples [24 tests] [27 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
672
690
Multi-Core Score
Helio G95 +10%
1908
Asset compression 93.8 MB/sec 87.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 50.7 pages/sec 46 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.8 Mpixels/sec 60.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36.8 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 61 Mpixels/sec 54.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.29 images/sec 4.33 images/sec
Photo processing 19.3 images/sec 17 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 2.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 16 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G95 +72%
2137
Background blur 3.45 images/sec 1.89 images/sec
Face detection 1.88 images/sec 1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 6.35 Gpixels/sec 3.56 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 303.4 FPS 205 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Helio G95 +33%
177
Score 177 133
Stability 95% -
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Helio G95 +31%
421
Score 421 321
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Helio G95 +9%
8389
Web score 6290 5809
Video editing score 6017 4676
Data manipulation score 6984 6639
Photo editing score 17761 16616
Writing score 9390 8819
Phones tested 3 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 51 FPS
[Low]
51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
37 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 57 FPS
[Low]
59 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[High]
52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 27 FPS
[Low]
34 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 52 FPS
[Ultra]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Realme 7
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio G95
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Nurbakhyt)AnTuTu 12590155
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (rejaulakash)AnTuTu 11545523
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Rey Firmansyah)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 1754
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Stoic-saint)AnTuTu 11502377
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-24 (alvyan)AnTuTu 11545793
MediaTek Dimensity 700
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Asafe oliveira)AnTuTu 12571874
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (HeartBun)AnTuTu 11505793
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Sus Go0d)Geekbench 6 CPU713 / 1916
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)CPU Throttle53%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)Geekbench 6 GPU1491

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Dimensity 700

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2050 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 12 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP4 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 4 2
Shading units 24 32
Total shaders 96 64
FLOPS 172.8 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU Yes
NPU theoretical performance 1 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.1 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 10 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 November 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6785V/CD MT6833V/ZA
Official page MediaTek Helio G95 official site MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site
Successor - MediaTek Helio G99 - MediaTek Dimensity 720

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3759 (37.1%)
6384 (62.9%)
Total votes: 10143

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Helio G95, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ItzRandom February 22, 2023 at 10:21 PM
These chips are pretty good. Happens to use both poco M3 pro and Redmi note 10s, both perform so well πŸ‘πŸ‘
+41 Reply
Avatar
Drake February 14, 2023 at 11:36 PM
I think battery management and optimization are far more important for a phone. I also play games like pubg, mlbb, and genshin. 1 thing I don't like when playing is the phone heating issue, it makes my hands wet when playing, then that fast battery consumption its very bad for the phone to use while charging. The GPU is the least I consider as long as I can play comfortably. G95 is just a bit higher GPU score but D700 has better battery optimization and heat control since it's 7mn only compare to 12mn G95. so overall my bote goes to D700.
+26 Reply
Avatar
Hemanth July 30, 2021 at 02:29 PM
If you want 5g then go for Med 700nm otherwise Med g95 far better. No one can tell when 5g sim's will come in market.
+93 Reply
Avatar
Joshua January 1, 2023 at 11:42 AM
Lol, they're here & I get 350 mb/s dl & 100+ mb/s upload in good ol' South Carolina, using by far the most reliable American 5g architecture, T-Mobile towers, on my UMIDIGI A13 Pro 5G. Wish I'd got the MAX version with dimensity 900 though🀷. My 5g is over 10x faster than my ATT Wi-Fi πŸ’―
+7 Reply
Avatar
NameChanged June 11, 2021 at 09:38 PM
I think the 7nm architecture of the Dimensity 700 does the trick here. 7nm chips are going to be efficient compared to the 12nm ones.
+133 Reply