Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 480

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 480 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 9 score – 400K vs 329K
  • Announced 10-months later
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
400932
CPU 119437 96825
GPU 99927 87610
Memory 68799 63810
UX 111775 80768
Total score 400932 329361

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression - 106.3 Mpixels/s
Face detection - 11.8 images/s
Speech recognition - 29.8 words/s
Machine learning - 27.7 images/s
Camera shooting - 16 images/s
HTML 5 - 1.71 Mnodes/s
SQLite - 551.1 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 7 FPS 5 FPS
Score 1202 982

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 480

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 6 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP - 3 W

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 825 MHz
Execution units - 2
Shading units 128 128
FLOPS 536 Gigaflops 468 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 15
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 210 Mbps Up to 210 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 January 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM4350
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
376 (83%)
77 (17%)
Total votes: 453

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 480 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Avatar
CZA 09 January 2023 23:43
While the 695 is the better chipset, looking at the price comparison between the 2 one must wonder if it is really worth the price difference. For example, Nokia uses the 695 for the X30 and the 480 for the X20. Taking away such superfluous differences as the extra memory in both storage and RAM, plus a couple of different standards added in its wireless communication (for which the average user wouldn't even be aware). One must ask, is it really worth paying nearly TWICE THE COST for something that most people buying at this level wouldn't even notice or appreciate the difference?
0 Reply
Avatar
BMKS007 24 July 2022 09:27
Wrong, 480 chipset holds its own in comparison and is A+ for the price of the device it comes in
+33 Reply
Avatar
Vaaluhaari 29 March 2022 17:52
Both have the same Graphics so if you're considering graphics, 480 is better as it has a lower price.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Siciid 26 January 2022 09:00
695 is much better than 480
+68 Reply