Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 480

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 480 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Shows better (up to 36%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 435K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~29%)
  • Performs 29% better in floating-point computations
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 187609
GPU 56314 47047
Memory 136317 88556
UX 161480 112498
Total score 592015 435710
Samples [83 tests] [2 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 84.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 33.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 50 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 34.4 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 55.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.26 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 6.51 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.28 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.07 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.03 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 0.58 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 186 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 291
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 6774
Video editing score 3911 3952
Data manipulation score 8663 6917
Photo editing score 18151 15336
Writing score 13129 9524
Phones tested 21 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Izzy)AnTuTu435710
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (J4CK)GeekBench GPU916
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (J4CK)GeekBench CPU688 / 1762
πŸ“˜ 2023-10-09 (JesΓΊs GR)GeekBench CPU693 / 1681
πŸ“˜ 2023-09-19 (Guest #4)GeekBench CPU689 / 1597

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 480

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 6 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 3 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 650 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 332.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 January 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM4350
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
571 (77.8%)
163 (22.2%)
Total votes: 734

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 480 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
CZA January 9, 2023 at 11:43 PM
While the 695 is the better chipset, looking at the price comparison between the 2 one must wonder if it is really worth the price difference. For example, Nokia uses the 695 for the X30 and the 480 for the X20. Taking away such superfluous differences as the extra memory in both storage and RAM, plus a couple of different standards added in its wireless communication (for which the average user wouldn't even be aware). One must ask, is it really worth paying nearly TWICE THE COST for something that most people buying at this level wouldn't even notice or appreciate the difference?
+15 Reply
Avatar
Mohamed Hassan March 7, 2023 at 07:06 PM
It's true that if you look at the MSRP of the phones, there is a big difference in price. However, with discounts available, the difference can be shrunk to about $50. At that price, you can still get about 20% performance for about 20% increase in price. (I'm not suggesting that the 480 5g is a bad chip, but if you want a little bit more performance you can get it with the 695 5g) I guess, what I'm trying to say is that both chips are great chips and are great bang for the buck.
+5 Reply
Avatar
BMKS007 July 24, 2022 at 09:27 AM
Wrong, 480 chipset holds its own in comparison and is A+ for the price of the device it comes in
+75 Reply