Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 480 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and 480 Plus (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~29%)
  • Performs 29% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 477K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 193048
GPU 56314 47353
Memory 136317 106103
UX 161480 131038
Total score 592015 477542
Samples [83 tests] [5 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 94.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 45.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 65.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 37.3 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 55.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 4.81 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 14.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.71 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.35 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 238.4 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 292
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 11176
Video editing score 3911 4533
Data manipulation score 8663 6337
Photo editing score 18151 26348
Writing score 13129 13103
Phones tested 21 models 4 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-08 (Aditya)AnTuTu 11513089
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (KhrizU)AnTuTu 11426353
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 -> DYi22AnTuTu 11477542
πŸ“˜ 2023-12-05 (Guest #3)Geekbench 6 CPU743 / 1890

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 480 Plus

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 6 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 3 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 650 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 332.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Low end
Model number SM6375 SM4350-AC
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
309 (72.5%)
117 (27.5%)
Total votes: 426

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 480 Plus and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!