Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 678

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 678 (Adreno 612). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 88% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 11 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 16%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 510K
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
CPU 237904 216553
GPU 56314 30227
Memory 136317 103694
UX 161480 160187
Total score 592015 510711
Samples [83 tests] [3 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 89.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 41.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 48.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 31.4 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 52.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 4.96 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 9.43 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.57 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.12 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.55 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 0.42 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 83.2 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 6057
Video editing score 3911 5351
Data manipulation score 8663 6444
Photo editing score 18151 14635
Writing score 13129 9952
Phones tested 21 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
41 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
40 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
14 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
48 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Sayato)AnTuTu510711
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Twilight)GeekBench CPU704 / 1529
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-21 (Rainx)AnTuTu447401
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-10 (zafarchik)GeekBench CPU714 / 1577

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 678

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 16 KB
L2 cache - 256 KB
Process 6 nanometers 11 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 612
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 840 MHz 895 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 229.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 685

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 X12
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced October 2021 December 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 SM6150-AC
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
165 (62.7%)
98 (37.3%)
Total votes: 263

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 678 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!