Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 695 – what's better?

Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 695

Snapdragon 778G
VS
Snapdragon 695
Snapdragon 778G
Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (2)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 31% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 32%) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 592K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~53%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 778G
vs
Snapdragon 695

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 778G +32%
783606
Snapdragon 695
592015
CPU 326426 237904
GPU 101452 56314
Memory 119484 136317
UX 236244 161480
Total score 783606 592015
Samples [113 tests] [83 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 360
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 4 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 9704
Video editing score 6994 3911
Data manipulation score 9642 8663
Photo editing score 24463 18151
Writing score 14285 13129
Phones tested 11 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]		 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]		 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]		 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]		 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Jaegerr)AnTuTu791396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (bebequinhamota)AnTuTu744550
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-24 (kat)AnTuTu747598
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (CarlosSM)AnTuTu839993
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 -> SynXAnTuTu820292
Add View all (175)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Add View all (111)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 550 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 256
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
7668 (86.1%)
1234 (13.9%)
Total votes: 8902

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (30)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (13)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Soul VietNam March 24, 2023 at 07:49 PM
I am using Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Snapdragon 778G), and after more than 1 year of using it works very well. Although play game it is not as powerful as Snapdragon 855, it has the best optimization in terms of temperature and battery.
+190 Reply
Avatar
Suraj January 23, 2023 at 03:27 PM
Vivo T1 pro 5g best mid ranger as of right now i think.
+157 Reply
EnglishРусский