Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642L graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 32%) AnTuTu 9 score – 528K vs 400K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~71%)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
528823
CPU 139509 119437
GPU 164092 99927
Memory 98919 68799
UX 125614 111775
Total score 528823 400932

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression 175.3 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 25 images/s -
Speech recognition 41 words/s -
Machine learning 36.7 images/s -
Camera shooting 34.6 images/s -
HTML 5 3.03 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 988.8 Krows/s -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 14 FPS 7 FPS
Score 2463 1202

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]
66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]
67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]
19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP 5 W -

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642L Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 490 MHz 840 MHz
Execution units 2 -
Shading units 384 128
FLOPS - 536 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 686
Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 210 Mbps Up to 210 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4554 (87.5%)
648 (12.5%)
Total votes: 5202

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
Avatar
Suraj 23 January 2023 15:27
Vivo T1 pro 5g best mid ranger as of right now i think.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Intel_Inside 11 October 2022 17:31
How a terrible Snapdragon CPU? It is not advanced, our ATOM is faster than 150%! Trash Qualcomm.
+28 Reply
Avatar
Arjun 09 June 2022 13:49
Motorola g82 have Snapdragon 695 they should give Snapdragon 778g will better option to buy for midrange user.
+117 Reply
Avatar
Okkkkkk 21 March 2022 21:07
Samsung a52s has 778g. Very good mid-ranger in my opinion.
+117 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous 02 November 2022 16:22
Has a headphone jack and expandable storage as well!
+11 Reply
Avatar
Ace 04 March 2022 18:07
Disappointed for the Redmi Note 11 pro having a sd695 processor lacks 4k recording and slower memory speed. Should have used the sd778G instead.
+171 Reply
Avatar
Dhruv 10 March 2022 19:28
Also, realme speed edition is providing 778g but compromise on charger camera and screen although it is having 144hz but what about display quality can't compare to AMOLED
+253 Reply
Avatar
Lol 22 October 2022 06:56
Dhruv, How can u enjoy low-budget AMOLED?
+14 Reply
Avatar
Samurai X 09 November 2022 22:23
Dhruv, The rule of thumb should be, "LCD above OLED in budget phones, any day, every day"
+18 Reply