Snapdragon 778G Plus vs A15 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus (Adreno 642) with the older 6-core Apple A15 Bionic (Apple A15 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A15 Bionic
  • Performs 2.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.2x)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 72%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1413K vs 820K
  • 29% higher CPU clock speed (3230 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A15 Bionic +72%
1413275
CPU 326258 410975
GPU 98347 370837
Memory 163894 164151
UX 231711 467312
Total score 820210 1413275
Samples [16 tests] [69 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 159.4 MB/sec 208.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 77 pages/sec 122.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 118.3 Mpixels/sec 139.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 59 images/sec 125.1 images/sec
HDR 94.8 Mpixels/sec 179.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.5 images/sec 22.3 images/sec
Photo processing 27.9 images/sec 53.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.46 Mpixels/sec 6.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A15 Bionic +640%
20400
Background blur 5.54 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 2.85 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.62 Gpixels/sec 71.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 267.6 FPS 2198.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 9 tests 19 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3765
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 19 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 9 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 735 2854
Stability 99% 76%
Graphics test 4 FPS 17 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10381 -
Video editing score 7005 -
Data manipulation score 9312 -
Photo editing score 23875 -
Writing score 13809 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Fizzo)AnTuTu 11806003
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (Serj)AnTuTu 11759037
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-10 (Aroslav)AnTuTu 11854357
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-12 (Deividi)AnTuTu 11895081
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 -> SerhiiGeekbench 6 CPU1059 / 3012
Apple A15 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HotPowerAnTuTu 111184759
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 GPU21284
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vova)AnTuTu 111297615
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 CPU2423 / 5985
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (charlesddd)AnTuTu 111461749

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G Plus and A15 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche
4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2500 MHz 3230 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 12 MB
Process 6 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Apple A15 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 608 MHz 1338 MHz
Pipelines 2 5
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 640
FLOPS 622.6 Gigaflops 1712.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 15.8 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SM7325-AE APL1W07
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
26 (37.1%)
44 (62.9%)
Total votes: 70

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A15 Bionic and Snapdragon 778G Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!