Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 700 – what's better?

Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 700

Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
VS
Dimensity 700
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Dimensity 700

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (with Adreno 825 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (1)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
  • Performs 19.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 350% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 17.07 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 4.5x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2314K vs 515K
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 700
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • 46% higher CPU clock speed (3210 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~21%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
vs
Dimensity 700

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 +349%
2314417
Dimensity 700
515647
CPU 645495 185796
GPU 809405 44366
Memory 372805 120419
UX 486712 165066
Total score 2314417 515647
Samples [457 tests] [27 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 293.4 MB/sec 87.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 188.6 pages/sec 46 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 207.8 Mpixels/sec 60.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 152.7 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 216.4 Mpixels/sec 54.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.4 images/sec 4.33 images/sec
Photo processing 55.2 images/sec 17 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.25 Mpixels/sec 2.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 33.5 images/sec 1.89 images/sec
Face detection 16.8 images/sec 1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.62 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.77 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.2 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 70.4 Gpixels/sec 3.56 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2750.3 FPS 205 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 35 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1688 133
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 13 FPS 1 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7641 -
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 34 FPS -
Section 2 29 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3705 321
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 22 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15597 5809
Video editing score 7750 4676
Data manipulation score 13734 6639
Photo editing score 26988 16616
Writing score 17764 8819
Phones tested 8 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 37 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite - 25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 59 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 34 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (uniq)AnTuTu2306405
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (MamadCyber)AnTuTu2244442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (diesel)AnTuTu2360168
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (D1saver)AnTuTu2328560
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> Saib2001AnTuTu2415079
Add View all (522)
MediaTek Dimensity 700
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (HeartBun)AnTuTu505793
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Sus Go0d)GeekBench CPU713 / 1916
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)CPU Throttle53%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)GeekBench GPU1491
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)GeekBench CPU683 / 1924
Add View all (42)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and Dimensity 700

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3210 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 825 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 800 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1150 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 512 32
Total shaders 1024 64
FLOPS 2355.2 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 5
Bluetooth 6.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2025 November 2020
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8735 MT6833V/ZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 official site MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 720

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (80%)
1 (20%)
Total votes: 5

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (2)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (9)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (2)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (23)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (48)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (8)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Apple A17 Pro
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (169)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) (13)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Riskyboom December 19, 2025 at 02:52 AM
i went from dimensity 700 to 8s gen 4 this year ;D
0 Reply
EnglishРусский