Exynos 2100 vs Tensor G2

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Announced 1-year and 10-months later
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
755523
754442
CPU 202484 203616
GPU 285430 295372
Memory 123653 108654
UX 140161 142235
Total score 755523 754442

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1090
1061
Multi-Core Score
3621
3242
Image compression 168.4 Mpixels/s 168.3 Mpixels/s
Face detection 27.5 images/s 24.5 images/s
Speech recognition 65.6 words/s 69.4 words/s
Machine learning 50.9 images/s 71.2 images/s
Camera shooting 31.1 images/s 31.2 images/s
HTML 5 3.39 Mnodes/s 2.97 Mnodes/s
SQLite 1010 Krows/s 1010 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Tensor G2 +13%
6411
Stability 66% 71%
Graphics test 33 FPS 38 FPS
Score 5677 6411

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A -
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP 9 W -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture Vallhall 2 Valhall
GPU frequency 760 MHz -
Execution units 14 7
Shading units 224 -
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3000 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 422 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2020 October 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
69 (53.9%)
59 (46.1%)
Total votes: 128

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions
Avatar
Nope 02 December 2022 12:56
Wow can't believe Tensor can't even beat last year's Samsung chip, and Exynos has been underwhelming.
+7 Reply