Exynos 2100 vs Tensor G2

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G2
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1186K vs 1065K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1065369
Tensor G2 +11%
1186373
CPU 373598 384056
GPU 156133 278383
Memory 227441 220709
UX 308197 303255
Total score 1065369 1186373
Samples [40 tests] [54 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tensor G2 +2%
1461
Multi-Core Score
Tensor G2 +9%
3867
Asset compression 162 MB/sec 149.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 104 pages/sec 99.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 135.5 Mpixels/sec 110.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 69.2 images/sec 74.2 images/sec
HDR 113 Mpixels/sec 105.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.9 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 35.2 images/sec 35.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.67 Mpixels/sec 4.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
6754
4715
Background blur 9.88 images/sec 6.68 images/sec
Face detection 5.1 images/sec 3.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 21.5 Gpixels/sec 11.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1290.7 FPS 972.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 17 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tensor G2 +114%
702
Score 328 702
Stability 72% 78%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Tensor G2 +1%
1821
Score 1800 1821
Stability 64% 77%
Graphics test 10 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13533
10994
Web score 13238 7923
Video editing score 7092 6434
Data manipulation score 10433 11061
Photo editing score 29658 18842
Writing score 15614 15053
Phones tested Less than 3 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Nurik)AnTuTu 12900228
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luckyy)AnTuTu 121281558
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder)AnTuTu 111014567
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> putkin_prosrochka59AnTuTu 121477460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.4-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 854 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 14 7
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 448 448
FLOPS 765.2 Gigaflops 759.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
NPU theoretical performance 26 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 Exynos 5300g
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2020 October 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 GS201 (S5P9855)
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
314 (52.9%)
280 (47.1%)
Total votes: 594

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!