Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000 – what's better?

Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000

Exynos 2200
VS
Dimensity 9000
Exynos 2200
Dimensity 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Mali-G710 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (9)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~54%)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 2200
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3050 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1504K vs 1434K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 2200
vs
Dimensity 9000

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2200
1434169
Dimensity 9000 +5%
1504467
CPU 472427 546692
GPU 390230 290175
Memory 216173 237462
UX 355339 430138
Total score 1434169 1504467
Samples [52 tests] [14 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2200
1588
Dimensity 9000 +7%
1693
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2200
3958
Dimensity 9000 +11%
4384
Asset compression 169.2 MB/sec 170.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 103 pages/sec 120.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 133.7 Mpixels/sec 138.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 101.3 images/sec 115.4 images/sec
HDR 130.8 Mpixels/sec 140.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 38.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +58%
10088
Dimensity 9000
6397
Background blur 14.6 images/sec 8.55 images/sec
Face detection 9.75 images/sec 4.42 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.48 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 38.1 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1860.5 FPS 1296 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 14 tests 10 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 900 775
Stability 66% 63%
Graphics test 7 FPS 6 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 3972 -
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 2200
1918
Dimensity 9000 +22%
2332
Score 1918 2332
Stability 64% 71%
Graphics test 11 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 11932 -
Video editing score 7385 -
Data manipulation score 12323 -
Photo editing score 24230 -
Writing score 16664 -
Phones tested 4 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 ((tiktok:frowners_tech_))AnTuTu 121674395
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642
Add View all (88)
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu 111584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu 111542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu 111561642
Add View all (29)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9000

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510		 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 3050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G710 MP10
Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1306 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 3 10
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 384 640
FLOPS 1003 Gigaflops 1085.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 590

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3200 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2022 November 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9925 MT6983
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
386 (27.7%)
1010 (72.3%)
Total votes: 1396

Related Comparisons

1. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (34)
2. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
4. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (22)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (11)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
8. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (1)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (3)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9000 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Snapdragon Fan June 7, 2024 at 09:33 PM
The best processors are from Snapdragon; MediaTek was very bad a few years ago. But, surprise, now the best processor is a MediaTek, specifically the Dimensity 9300, which scored 2,300,000 in Antutu. This shows the improvement that MediaTek has undergone over the years. Also, it's worth mentioning that the best MediaTek processor is not just more powerful than the SD 8 Gen 3, but it's also more efficient, consuming less energy. And it's not just the MediaTek Dimensity 9300; most of the MediaTek processors in all ranges surpass Qualcomm processors of the same range. In conclusion: MediaTek is better.
0 Reply
Avatar
Hussain January 19, 2022 at 06:21 PM
Flagship phones are now turning to 3200x1440 other than 2400x1080 which dimensity 9000 cannot afford besides GPU frequency... a huge con
+74 Reply
Avatar
Luscious Lopez February 1, 2022 at 01:06 PM
Exynos is a waste of money... Snapdragon and Dimensity are best in every way!
+72 Reply
Avatar
Silvic February 17, 2022 at 06:56 AM
Luscious Lopez, Dependence on others for the chipset is the actual waste of money, Samsung doesn't import a good % of their device chipset, and it's also a market economy development strategy, if there's no Exynos then no one will see the competition and improve. That's why mtk is getting better than SD and Exynos isn't far behind. Exynos has top-notch GPU and you calling it to trash Cus u haven't used a Samsung device with that SoC, u probably just watch YouTube and conclude which is better than the other with no clue how SoC work 😐😐
+25 Reply
Avatar
kkkkkk March 30, 2022 at 10:36 AM
Silvic, completely agree with u. People just hate exynos 2200 for legit no reason. on paper it's 25% slower than a15 bionic but when it comes to real-life speed it's like 1 or 2 secs slower. With updates, exynos 2200 will improve
+18 Reply
Avatar
TGP March 30, 2022 at 10:02 PM
kkkkkk, Even on paper, it is actually a lot more competitive than the A15 Bionic than that. Its GPU is better than the Bionic overall when you look at real-world FPS benchmarks after the performance limiter was taken off recently in an update. Now it generally outperforms the snapdragon and is more on the level of the dimensity 9000 or better in GPU performance. The Bionic rules the benchmarks because Apple pays those companies a fucking LOT of money to incorporate algorithms that will help their specific architecture's score. If you look at some videos of people doing real-world tests with the GPU limiter off the Exynos 2200 might be the best gaming chip on the market right now. CPU performance hardly even matters in Android anyways.
+8 Reply
Avatar
bruhhhh May 1, 2022 at 10:06 AM
TGP, yes agreed. When Exynos 2100 came out the same thing happened but if u compare them now(s888 and e2100i) after 1 year there is legit no difference and in some cases, the e2100 is better also. Gaming has been optimized for e2100.same thing for e2200. just wait some days for developers to optimize and then compare gaming.
+12 Reply
Avatar
POCO Fanboy June 7, 2024 at 09:26 PM
kkkkkk, The processor efficiency and performance cannot be improved just with software updates. The processor needs to be well built and optimized from the fabric to perform well, and most of the Exynos processors are not well optimized compared to the competition, Snapdragon and MediaTek.
0 Reply
Avatar
Exynos=πŸ’© June 7, 2024 at 09:35 PM
bruhhhh, Exynos is very bad they will not optimise it the game companys made their games optimised just for mediatek and especially snapdragon processor.
0 Reply
EnglishРусский