Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Mali-G710). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~53%)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3050 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 8%) AnTuTu 9 score – 1012K vs 936K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
936802
1012754
CPU 223163 257633
GPU 391575 392328
Memory 175188 188783
UX 154579 183037
Total score 936802 1012754

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1270
Multi-Core Score
4259

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
8001
Stability 64% 84%
Graphics test 41 FPS 47 FPS
Score 6874 8001

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9000

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 3050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 1024 KB
L2 cache - 3.5 MB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP - 4 W

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G710
Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 3
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 24 10
Shading units 384 512
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3000 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 422 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2022 November 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9925 MT6983
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9000 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
273 (25.4%)
803 (74.6%)
Total votes: 1076

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9000 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
Avatar
Hussain 19 January 2022 18:21
Flagship phones are now turning to 3200x1440 other than 2400x1080 which dimensity 9000 cannot afford besides GPU frequency... a huge con
+54 Reply
Avatar
Luscious Lopez 01 February 2022 13:06
Exynos is a waste of money... Snapdragon and Dimensity are best in every way!
+49 Reply
Avatar
Silvic 17 February 2022 06:56
Luscious Lopez, Dependence on others for the chipset is the actual waste of money, Samsung doesn't import a good % of their device chipset, and it's also a market economy development strategy, if there's no Exynos then no one will see the competition and improve. That's why mtk is getting better than SD and Exynos isn't far behind. Exynos has top-notch GPU and you calling it to trash Cus u haven't used a Samsung device with that SoC, u probably just watch YouTube and conclude which is better than the other with no clue how SoC work 😐😐
+16 Reply
Avatar
kkkkkk 30 March 2022 10:36
Silvic, completely agree with u. People just hate exynos 2200 for legit no reason. on paper it's 25% slower than a15 bionic but when it comes to real-life speed it's like 1 or 2 secs slower. With updates, exynos 2200 will improve
+8 Reply
Avatar
TGP 30 March 2022 22:02
kkkkkk, Even on paper, it is actually a lot more competitive than the A15 Bionic than that. Its GPU is better than the Bionic overall when you look at real-world FPS benchmarks after the performance limiter was taken off recently in an update. Now it generally outperforms the snapdragon and is more on the level of the dimensity 9000 or better in GPU performance. The Bionic rules the benchmarks because Apple pays those companies a fucking LOT of money to incorporate algorithms that will help their specific architecture's score. If you look at some videos of people doing real-world tests with the GPU limiter off the Exynos 2200 might be the best gaming chip on the market right now. CPU performance hardly even matters in Android anyways.
+3 Reply
Avatar
bruhhhh 01 May 2022 10:06
TGP, yes agreed. When Exynos 2100 came out the same thing happened but if u compare them now(s888 and e2100i) after 1 year there is legit no difference and in some cases, the e2100 is better also. Gaming has been optimized for e2100.same thing for e2200. just wait some days for developers to optimize and then compare gaming.
+2 Reply
Promotion