Exynos 9820 vs Exynos 2200
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9820 (with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics) and Exynos 2200 (Samsung Xclipse 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 8 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~86%)
- Shows significantly better (up to 93%) AnTuTu 11 score β 1434K vs 744K
- Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 297306 | 472427 |
| GPU | 132919 | 390230 |
| Memory | 146753 | 216173 |
| UX | 167343 | 355339 |
| Total score | 744321 | 1434169 |
| Samples | [42 tests] | [52 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 114.9 MB/sec | 169.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 69.4 pages/sec | 103 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 69 Mpixels/sec | 133.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 44.9 images/sec | 101.3 images/sec |
| HDR | 72.5 Mpixels/sec | 130.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 7.34 images/sec | 14.7 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 18.1 images/sec | 34.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.83 Mpixels/sec | 4.65 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 20 tests | 25 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 7.03 images/sec | 14.6 images/sec |
| Face detection | 4.35 images/sec | 9.75 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.21 Gpixels/sec | 0.41 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.27 Gpixels/sec | 0.36 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.24 Gpixels/sec | 0.48 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.07 Gpixels/sec | 0.15 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 14.5 Gpixels/sec | 38.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 739.3 FPS | 1860.5 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | Vulkan |
| Samples | 5 tests | 14 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 367 | 900 |
| Stability | 81% | 66% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | - | 3972 |
| Stability | - | 66% |
| Graphics test | - | 15 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 18 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 15 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 12 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 950 | 1918 |
| Stability | 82% | 64% |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | 11 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 7478 | 11932 |
| Video editing score | 5765 | 7385 |
| Data manipulation score | 7575 | 12323 |
| Photo editing score | 18093 | 24230 |
| Writing score | 10112 | 16664 |
| Phones tested | 3 models | 4 models |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 9820
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-15 (Sv1at) | AnTuTu 12 | 929674 |
| π 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv) | CPU Throttle | 76% |
| π 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv) | AnTuTu 11 | 717771 |
| π 2026-09-27 (Arifz) | AnTuTu 12 | 769471 |
| π 2026-09-26 (Lurky) | AnTuTu 12 | 932812 |
Samsung Exynos 2200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-22 -> Mihnea | Geekbench 7 CPU | 1390 / 3641 |
| π 2026-10-22 -> Mihnea | AnTuTu 12 | 1661485 |
| π 2026-10-21 -> Pixelix | AnTuTu 12 | 1820994 |
| π 2026-10-21 -> Pixelix | AnTuTu 12 | 1786295 |
| π 2026-10-19 (ΠΠ»Π΅Π±) | AnTuTu 12 | 1691092 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Exynos 2200CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.73 GHz β Mongoose M4 2x 2.31 GHz β Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.8 GHz β Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz β Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz β Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2730 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8.5 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 7 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP12 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | RDNA 2 |
| GPU frequency | 702 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Pipelines | 12 | 3 |
| Shading units | 24 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 288 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 404.4 Gigaflops | 1003 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | - | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 Gb/s | 51.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2400 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 200MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5100 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2000 Mbps | Up to 7350 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | November 2018 | January 2022 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9820 | S5E9925 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9820 official site | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site |
| Successor | - Samsung Exynos 2200 | - |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 56