Exynos 990 vs Snapdragon 888 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus (Adreno 660). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 990
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 33%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1208K vs 907K
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2995 vs 2730 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
907140
1208784
CPU 370196 427402
GPU 130687 237850
Memory 151878 183144
UX 254379 360388
Total score 907140 1208784
Samples [50 tests] [5 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 168.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 108.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 136.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 89.6 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 124 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 14.4 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 34.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.61 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 5.76 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 6.49 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 552.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 8 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1416 1252
Stability 65% 97%
Graphics test 8 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11402
12644
Web score 10705 10869
Video editing score 6884 7477
Data manipulation score 8823 10013
Photo editing score 30928 27933
Writing score 11422 14232
Phones tested 6 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-22 (kukuhatop2281337)AnTuTu 111208784
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-15 (Lucas)AnTuTu 111200817
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-08 (WrongButton)AnTuTu 111156304
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-18 (edge30fusionhype)AnTuTu 111235608
πŸ“˜ 2024-05-04 (Marcel Pipek)Geekbench 6 GPU5117

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Snapdragon 888 Plus

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.995 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2995 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache 192 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 2 MB 4 MB
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Adreno 660
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 832 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 11 3
Shading units 32 256
Total shaders 352 768
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 1290.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 780
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 X60
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 June 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 SM8350-AC
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
9 (21.4%)
33 (78.6%)
Total votes: 42

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 888 Plus and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!