Exynos 990 vs Exynos 9820

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Exynos 9820 (Mali-G76 MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Performs 45% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 744K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +22%
907140
744321
CPU 370196 297306
GPU 130687 132919
Memory 151878 146753
UX 254379 167343
Total score 907140 744321
Samples [50 tests] [42 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +21%
1222
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 990 +13%
3060
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 114.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 69.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 69 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 44.9 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 72.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 7.34 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 18.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 2.83 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 20 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 7.03 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 4.35 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.27 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 14.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 739.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 8 tests 5 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
391
Score 391 367
Stability 73% 81%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 990 +49%
1416
Score 1416 950
Stability 65% 82%
Graphics test 8 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +27%
11402
Web score 10705 7478
Video editing score 6884 5765
Data manipulation score 8823 7575
Photo editing score 30928 18093
Writing score 11422 10112
Phones tested 6 models 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 -> Jazari28AnTuTu 12993568
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
Samsung Exynos 9820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Sv1at)AnTuTu 12929674
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)CPU Throttle76%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Vzxzv)AnTuTu 11717771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Arifz)AnTuTu 12769471
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Lurky)AnTuTu 12932812

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Exynos 9820

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.73 GHz – Mongoose M4
2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 8 nanometers
Transistor count - 8.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G76 MP12
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 702 MHz
Pipelines 11 12
Shading units 32 24
Total shaders 352 288
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 404.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Exynos 5100
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 20
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 2000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 316 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2019 November 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 S5E9820
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Samsung Exynos 9820 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 - Samsung Exynos 2200

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
388 (70.5%)
162 (29.5%)
Total votes: 550

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 9820 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!