AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 2 years and 2 months older Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) that utilizes 96 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 610M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 4x higher maximum theoretical performance (2.4 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 3.4x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (17K vs 5K)
  • Has 6x more shading units (768 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
21
11
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
12
11
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
19
12
9
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
14
11
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy -
9
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
14
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077 -
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
15
13
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 14
1080p Ultra - 10
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 1282
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 4411
Wild Life Extreme 998 3119
Night Raid 7335 14097
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 12 img/sec 34.5 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 27.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.75 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 55.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 3061.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 -
DirectX 11 17 FPS -
DirectX 12 7 FPS -
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 194 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 47 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 OpenCL16849
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 1428
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 2420
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 1551
Face Detection (HP) 2153 3685
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 6255
Text Classification (SP) 713 938
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 1028
Object Detection (SP) 709 1581
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 4305
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 26119
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Mendocino Tiger Lake GT2
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
Laptop GPU ranking (125th and 124th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 950-1550 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 24
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 96
Ray-tracing Cores 2 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 23-37 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 46-74 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
1.5-2.4 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 122 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
11 (45.8%)
13 (54.2%)
Total votes: 24

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!