Radeon 840M vs Radeon 680M

VS
AMD Radeon 840M
Krackan Point

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 840M with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 3 years and 1 month older Radeon 680M that utilizes 12 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 680M over Radeon 840M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 840M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 62%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.5x higher maximum theoretical performance (3.7 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (28K vs 14K)
  • Has 3x more shading units (768 vs 256)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
14
12
-
-
The Witcher 3
11
12
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
27
20
14
-
-
Far Cry 6
21
17
12
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
19
14
9
-
Ghost of Tsushima
13
10
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
10
10
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
18
11
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 -
1080p Ultra 14 -
1440p Ultra 10 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
2140
Time Spy 1699 2327
Solar Bay 6960 9712
Port Royal 553 1008
Fire Strike 5303 6903
Wild Life Extreme 2671 4163
Night Raid 22563 27534
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
14025
Radeon 680M +104%
28675
Background Blur 31.8 img/sec 73.8 img/sec
Face Detection 16.8 img/sec 30.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.93 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 1.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 1.17 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 52.5 Gpixels/sec 105 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2048.6 FPS 4640 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
4444
G2D Mark 870 723
DirectX 11 32 FPS 40 FPS
DirectX 12 17 FPS 21 FPS
GPU Compute 1697 Ops/s 2006 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 1020 & 176 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
120.67
238.39
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 12 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 840M
No benchmark results yet
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)Geekbench 6 OpenCL26880

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
5834
GB6 ML Half Precision
8202
GB6 ML Quantized
4169
Image Classification (SP) 1988 1976
Image Segmentation (HP) 2184 3138
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4788 6693
Face Detection (HP) 6857 7213
Pose Estimation (Q) 17396 21849
Text Classification (SP) 1628 1497
Machine Translation (HP) 2053 2579
Object Detection (SP) 1825 2154
Depth Estimation (Q) 8471 9635
Style Transfer (SP) 31032 56269
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 840M and Radeon 680M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 January 1, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 RDNA 2.0
GPU Codename Krackan Point Rembrandt
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 130T - Radeon RX Vega 8
Successor - - Radeon 8050S
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
- AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
Laptop GPU ranking (108th and 104th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 400 MHz
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2200-2400 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 256 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 12
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores 4 12
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 GPixel/s 70-77 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTexel/s 106-115 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.5 TFLOPS
Radeon 680M +147%
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 6 nm
Die Size 195 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor Count - 13.1 billion
Transistor Density - 62.98 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.0
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
10 (100%)
Total votes: 10

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!