A17 Pro vs A14 Bionic

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A17 Pro (with Apple A17 GPU graphics) and A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Performs 3.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • 22% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 3100 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~9%)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1467K vs 1326K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A17 Pro +11%
1467470
1326975
CPU 374357 364692
GPU 463612 311592
Memory 184670 180518
UX 444831 470169
Total score 1467470 1326975
Samples [21 tests] [55 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A17 Pro +42%
2969
2095
Multi-Core Score
A17 Pro +43%
7599
5297
Asset compression 254.1 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 166 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 180.7 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 178.7 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 240.3 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 26.7 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 77.8 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.76 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 32 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A17 Pro +67%
28057
16822
Background blur 55.5 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 65.1 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.08 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.11 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 87.6 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3313.9 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API Metal Metal
Samples 22 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1391
Score 1391 -
Stability 71% -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
A17 Pro +120%
6089
2767
Score 6089 2767
Stability 73% 85%
Graphics test 23 FPS 11 FPS
Section 1 29 FPS 13 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 10 FPS
Section 3 16 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A17 Pro +64%
3655
2229
Score 3655 2229
Stability 63% 86%
Graphics test 21 FPS 13 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111996792
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-08 (Shuvo)AnTuTu 111278519
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Barelpunch)AnTuTu 111200682
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Z0tacxyz)AnTuTu 111294739
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Timur)AnTuTu 111199214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (kudryash)AnTuTu 111196958

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of A17 Pro and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 6 6
Frequency 3780 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.6-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 256 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A17 GPU Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1398 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 6 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 2147.2 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 35 TOPS 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution 2796 x 1290 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X70 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2023 September 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1V02 APL1W01
Successor - Apple A20 Pro - Apple A20 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
326 (69.8%)
141 (30.2%)
Total votes: 467

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and A17 Pro, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
David October 11, 2023 at 07:09 PM
I just switched from the iPhone 12 Pro Max (A14 Bionic) to the iPhone 15 Pro Max (A17 Pro) and there is a huge difference, easily double the performance! The battery consumption is also really good!
+22 Reply
Avatar
Valerian November 3, 2023 at 04:58 PM
I don't believe the A17 Pro is worth it. You should have waited another year. That's my plan! ;)
+21 Reply
Avatar
Con December 10, 2023 at 08:33 AM
Valerian, I certainly agree. Perhaps if the improvement lies in the camera and screen, then maybe consider upgrading, however, if it's solely for the processor, then I'd recommend not upgrading.
+3 Reply