A17 Pro vs A15 Bionic

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A17 Pro (with Apple A17 GPU graphics) and A15 Bionic (Apple A15 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Performs 25% better in floating-point computations
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 3230 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1467K vs 1413K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A17 Pro +4%
1467470
1413275
CPU 374357 410975
GPU 463612 370837
Memory 184670 164151
UX 444831 467312
Total score 1467470 1413275
Samples [21 tests] [69 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A17 Pro +28%
2969
2315
Multi-Core Score
A17 Pro +32%
7599
5753
Asset compression 254.1 MB/sec 208.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 166 pages/sec 122.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 180.7 Mpixels/sec 139.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 178.7 images/sec 125.1 images/sec
HDR 240.3 Mpixels/sec 179.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 26.7 images/sec 22.3 images/sec
Photo processing 77.8 images/sec 53.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.76 Mpixels/sec 6.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 32 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A17 Pro +38%
28057
20400
Background blur 55.5 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 65.1 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.08 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.11 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.43 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 87.6 Gpixels/sec 71.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3313.9 FPS 2198.2 FPS
API Metal Metal
Samples 22 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1391
Score 1391 -
Stability 71% -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
A17 Pro +62%
6089
3765
Score 6089 3765
Stability 73% 71%
Graphics test 23 FPS 14 FPS
Section 1 29 FPS 19 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 14 FPS
Section 3 16 FPS 9 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A17 Pro +28%
3655
2854
Score 3655 2854
Stability 63% 76%
Graphics test 21 FPS 17 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111996792
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771
Apple A15 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Hoz4ik)AnTuTu 111127460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU2168 / 4988
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HotPowerAnTuTu 111184759
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 GPU21284
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vova)AnTuTu 111297615

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of A17 Pro and A15 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche
4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Cores 6 6
Frequency 3780 MHz 3230 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.6-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 256 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion 15 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A17 GPU Apple A15 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1398 MHz 1338 MHz
Pipelines 6 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 640
FLOPS 2147.2 Gigaflops 1712.6 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 35 TOPS 15.8 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution 1290 x 2796 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X70 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2023 September 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1V02 APL1W07
Successor - Apple A19 Pro - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
739 (51.2%)
705 (48.8%)
Total votes: 1444

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A15 Bionic and A17 Pro, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Fatality永遠 May 14, 2024 at 09:48 AM
To be honest, the A17 Pro suffered during the gaming performance test in Genshin Impact at full settings.
+40 Reply
Avatar
TechDud November 15, 2024 at 09:52 AM
Is it like full storage or the room temp is hot cuz it affects the performace of the device tho?
+14 Reply
Avatar
Mkkaj April 11, 2024 at 08:59 PM
Great comparison between two killer chips from Apple. I would love to see how far would apple compete with others
+30 Reply