Google Tensor vs A15 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20) with the older 6-core Apple A15 Bionic (Apple A15 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A15 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~57%)
  • Performs 58% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 40%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1413K vs 1010K
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3230 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1010025
A15 Bionic +40%
1413275
CPU 365546 410975
GPU 169803 370837
Memory 178763 164151
UX 295913 467312
Total score 1010025 1413275
Samples [51 tests] [69 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A15 Bionic +57%
2315
Multi-Core Score
A15 Bionic +60%
5753
Asset compression 159.8 MB/sec 208.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 97.5 pages/sec 122.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 139.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 83.4 images/sec 125.1 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 179.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.1 images/sec 22.3 images/sec
Photo processing 30.2 images/sec 53.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.44 Mpixels/sec 6.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 26 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A15 Bionic +129%
20400
Background blur 13.2 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 7.31 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.5 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.55 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 39.4 Gpixels/sec 71.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1368.9 FPS 2198.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 11 tests 19 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 704 -
Stability 63% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3765
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 19 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 9 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A15 Bionic +50%
2854
Score 1899 2854
Stability 59% 76%
Graphics test 11 FPS 17 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7105 -
Video editing score 5884 -
Data manipulation score 10310 -
Photo editing score 19072 -
Writing score 15550 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vladi♂️Slave♂️)AnTuTu 121281085
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu 11774697
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu 11930801
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (nguyen van nguyen)AnTuTu 11990021
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 (Mimo)AnTuTu 111117985
Apple A15 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HotPowerAnTuTu 111184759
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 GPU21284
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vova)AnTuTu 111297615
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> HotPowerGeekbench 6 CPU2423 / 5985
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (charlesddd)AnTuTu 111461749

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Google Tensor and A15 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche
4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2800 MHz 3230 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5.6 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP20 Apple A15 GPU
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1338 MHz
Pipelines 20 5
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 640 640
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 1712.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Tensor Processing Unit Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 15.8 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300b -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS101 (S5P9845) APL1W07
Official page Google Tensor official site -
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
740 (36.5%)
1288 (63.5%)
Total votes: 2028

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A15 Bionic and Google Tensor, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Danny December 15, 2021 at 06:20 AM
Google tensor vs apple a15 bionic Rookie vs longtime defending champion Verdict: apple a15 bionic wins easily
+53 Reply
Avatar
Error October 21, 2021 at 05:25 PM
A chip from Google. Based on samsung 5nm, this should not end up like 888. Let's wait for antutu score and other real life performance. Apple be like- Real battle is now started.
+40 Reply
Avatar
Alex October 25, 2021 at 09:49 AM
Antutu scores are not valid at all, not for comparing it to A-Series cpus since iOS antutu runs different benchmarks. They’ve claimed this same exact thing on their website
+8 Reply
Avatar
User not found October 27, 2021 at 05:44 PM
I expected that tensor chip outperforms in ML test, but it has a huge gap while compared to a15
+9 Reply
Avatar
Me. December 7, 2021 at 07:05 PM
User not found, Nah, it's always the same smoothest as the iPhone when you tried in MOBA, Except the Heaviest RPG/MMORPG one.
0 Reply
Avatar
Alex February 24, 2022 at 11:59 AM
obviously, as the a15 is just faster in general
+8 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous January 23, 2023 at 04:52 AM
Alex, Alex is not just faster but also more stable and efficient when it comes to heavy tasks.
+1 Reply
Avatar
the iphone vs android researching guy January 3, 2024 at 12:11 AM
Even though the iPhone 13's A15 outperformed the Google Pixel 6A's Tensor, the Google Pixel 6A, at $200, offers great value compared to the iPhone 13’s $600 price tag.
+4 Reply