Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (with Mali-G710 MP10 graphics) and Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Tensor
  • Shows significantly better (up to 49%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1504K vs 1010K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3050 vs 2800 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1504467
1010025
CPU 546692 365546
GPU 290175 169803
Memory 237462 178763
UX 430138 295913
Total score 1504467 1010025
Samples [14 tests] [51 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1693
Multi-Core Score
4384
Asset compression 170.6 MB/sec 159.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 120.5 pages/sec 97.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.2 Mpixels/sec 138.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 115.4 images/sec 83.4 images/sec
HDR 140.3 Mpixels/sec 119.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.7 images/sec 14.1 images/sec
Photo processing 38.9 images/sec 30.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 3.44 Mpixels/sec
Samples 12 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8918
Background blur 8.55 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Face detection 4.42 images/sec 7.31 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.5 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.3 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 39.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1296 FPS 1368.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 775 704
Stability 63% 63%
Graphics test 6 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
2332
Score 2332 1899
Stability 71% 59%
Graphics test 13 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 7105
Video editing score - 5884
Data manipulation score - 10310
Photo editing score - 19072
Writing score - 15550
Phones tested - 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu 111584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu 111542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu 111561642
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (rulz_103)AnTuTu 121225085
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> Islom_1180AnTuTu 121235821
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vladi♂️Slave♂️)AnTuTu 121281085
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu 11774697
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu 11930801

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9000 and Google Tensor

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3050 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5.6 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP10 Mali-G78 MP20
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 848 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 10 20
Shading units 64 32
Total shaders 640 640
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 1085.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 590 Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 60 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3200 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5300b
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7000 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced November 2021 October 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6983 GS101 (S5P9845)
Official page - Google Tensor official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
481 (85.1%)
84 (14.9%)
Total votes: 565

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Google Tensor and Dimensity 9000, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Big t April 24, 2025 at 01:47 PM
Tensor is a bog disappointment
0 Reply