Dimensity 9000 vs Dimensity 8100

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (with Mali-G710 MP10 graphics) and Dimensity 8100 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8100
  • Performs 64% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 38%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1504K vs 1092K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (3050 vs 2850 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1504467
1092605
CPU 546692 408979
GPU 290175 172618
Memory 237462 201895
UX 430138 309113
Total score 1504467 1092605
Samples [14 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 170.6 MB/sec 181.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 120.5 pages/sec 108.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.2 Mpixels/sec 134.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 115.4 images/sec 88.6 images/sec
HDR 140.3 Mpixels/sec 131.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.7 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 38.9 images/sec 32.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.69 Mpixels/sec 4.87 Mpixels/sec
Samples 12 tests 19 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 8.55 images/sec 4.92 images/sec
Face detection 4.42 images/sec 2.66 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.3 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 9.79 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1296 FPS 849.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 10 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 775 564
Stability 63% 92%
Graphics test 6 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2332 1540
Stability 71% 91%
Graphics test 13 FPS 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 11581
Video editing score - 7037
Data manipulation score - 8309
Photo editing score - 19759
Writing score - 16904
Phones tested - 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 77 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends - 74 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 98 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> alominzikkAnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Alominzikk)AnTuTu 111500307
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (LukisekCZ)AnTuTu 111584537
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (DG)AnTuTu 111542660
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (Gigimutu1)AnTuTu 111561642
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9000 and Dimensity 8100

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3050 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G710 MP10 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 848 MHz 860 MHz
Pipelines 10 6
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 640 384
FLOPS 1085.4 Gigaflops 660.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 590 MediaTek APU 580

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 60 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3200 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek UltraSave 2.0
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7000 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2021 March 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6983 MT6895Z/TCZA
Official page - MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1038 (66.7%)
518 (33.3%)
Total votes: 1556

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8100 and Dimensity 9000, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Manong December 30, 2025 at 06:26 AM
D9000 is better in GPU but , I prefer the D8100 very solid in long gaming sessions like Genshin Impact! D8100 is stable at 57fps at max settings! while D9000 throttles down to 48fps as you can see above 81% vs 99% stability explains a lot.
0 Reply