Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 7200

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.1x)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 971K vs 783K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
971424
CPU 326426 362430
GPU 101452 148984
Memory 119484 169068
UX 236244 290942
Total score 783606 971424
Samples [113 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 127.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 73.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 86.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 42.2 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 8.69 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 21.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 5.06 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 2.89 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 909.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 26 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 447
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 1158
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 4 FPS 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 -
Video editing score 6994 -
Data manipulation score 9642 -
Photo editing score 24463 -
Writing score 14285 -
Phones tested 11 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Carlos)AnTuTu 12858274
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (DJSanyaDance1995)AnTuTu 12907382
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (DJSanyaDance1995)AnTuTu 12907382
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Eversonsouzz)AnTuTu 12822536
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Jaegerr)AnTuTu 11791396
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vedurijuht2425)AnTuTu 121045921
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu 11980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu 11964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu 111003769
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (note8techh)AnTuTu 11984744

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Dimensity 7200

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 550 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 512 256
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X53 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 February 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 MT6886
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
825 (19.2%)
3479 (80.8%)
Total votes: 4304

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
John March 25, 2024 at 03:22 PM
Dimension has its problems. Though comparing here. It edges it. Hardly enough to warrant a full phone upgrade but if something comes cheap to you, go for it. Battery is enhanced and it does perform better. Just not enough worth when buying a new phone
+73 Reply