Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus (with Adreno 642 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 45% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 39%) AnTuTu 11 score – 820K vs 592K
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Higher GPU frequency (~38%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 326258 237904
GPU 98347 56314
Memory 163894 136317
UX 231711 161480
Total score 820210 592015
Samples [16 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 159.4 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 77 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 118.3 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 59 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 94.8 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.5 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 27.9 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.46 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.54 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 2.85 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.62 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 267.6 FPS 245.1 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 9 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 735 360
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 4 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10381 9704
Video editing score 7005 3911
Data manipulation score 9312 8663
Photo editing score 23875 18151
Writing score 13809 13129
Phones tested - 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Fizzo)AnTuTu 11806003
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (Serj)AnTuTu 11759037
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-10 (Aroslav)AnTuTu 11854357
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-12 (Deividi)AnTuTu 11895081
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 -> SerhiiGeekbench 6 CPU1059 / 3012
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G Plus and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 608 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 512 256
FLOPS 622.6 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325-AE SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
636 (83.8%)
123 (16.2%)
Total votes: 759

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 778G Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!