Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 860 vs Snapdragon 695 – what's better?

Snapdragon 860 vs Snapdragon 695

Snapdragon 860
VS
Snapdragon 695
Snapdragon 860
Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (with Adreno 640 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (5)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.13 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 39%) AnTuTu 11 score – 822K vs 592K
  • 35% higher CPU clock speed (2960 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 860
vs
Snapdragon 695

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 860 +39%
822433
Snapdragon 695
592015
CPU 299294 237904
GPU 119740 56314
Memory 162141 136317
UX 241258 161480
Total score 822433 592015
Samples [47 tests] [83 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 122.6 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.8 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 85.4 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.3 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 85.4 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.45 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 22.8 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.72 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 21 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 860 +113%
2985
Snapdragon 695
1403
Background blur 4.67 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 2.01 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.94 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 512.2 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 12 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 979 360
Stability 91% 98%
Graphics test 5 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 860 +12%
10591
Snapdragon 695
9496
Web score 8774 9704
Video editing score 6020 3911
Data manipulation score 8724 8663
Photo editing score 22475 18151
Writing score 13390 13129
Phones tested Less than 3 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]		 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 54 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Low]		 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 56 FPS
[Ultra]		 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 98 FPS
[Ultra]		 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]		 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (Zeexi)AnTuTu911542
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (Tymanovik)AnTuTu822512
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Aren)AnTuTu811317
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Aren)AnTuTu811317
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (Nafez De Vonsera)AnTuTu888889
Add View all (79)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Add View all (111)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 860 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2960 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 675 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 1036.8 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2019 October 2021
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8150-AC SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3118 (89%)
387 (11%)
Total votes: 3505

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (8)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (3)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 860, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
SafSaf May 11, 2022 at 10:44 PM
It's evolving, just backward
+29 Reply
Avatar
B tuna February 22, 2022 at 06:34 PM
such a disappointment for the poco x4 pro 5g, weak chip
+113 Reply
Avatar
Oof February 22, 2022 at 02:27 PM
Not even close in performance. Not just in gaming. The memory bandwidth is everything in day-to-day use.
+55 Reply
Avatar
Jo Byedin February 22, 2022 at 11:28 AM
The Poco X4 Pro is a huge downgrade
+75 Reply
Avatar
Lad March 1, 2022 at 02:39 AM
It's only for the 5g version, Poco X4 might have a better CPU processor
+21 Reply
EnglishРусский