Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 2200 vs Tensor G2 – what's better?

Exynos 2200 vs Tensor G2

Exynos 2200
VS
Tensor G2
Exynos 2200
Tensor G2

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and Google Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (1)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~54%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Performs 32% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 1186K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 2200
vs
Tensor G2

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2200 +21%
1434169
Tensor G2
1186373
CPU 472427 384056
GPU 390230 278383
Memory 216173 220709
UX 355339 303255
Total score 1434169 1186373
Samples [52 tests] [54 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +9%
1588
Tensor G2
1461
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +2%
3958
Tensor G2
3867
Asset compression 169.2 MB/sec 149.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 103 pages/sec 99.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 133.7 Mpixels/sec 110.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 101.3 images/sec 74.2 images/sec
HDR 130.8 Mpixels/sec 105.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 35.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 4.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +114%
10088
Tensor G2
4715
Background blur 14.6 images/sec 6.68 images/sec
Face detection 9.75 images/sec 3.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.48 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 38.1 Gpixels/sec 11.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1860.5 FPS 972.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2200 +28%
900
Tensor G2
702
Score 900 702
Stability 66% 78%
Graphics test 7 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 3972 -
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 2200 +5%
1918
Tensor G2
1821
Score 1918 1821
Stability 64% 77%
Graphics test 11 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 2200 +22%
13460
Tensor G2
10994
Web score 11932 7923
Video editing score 7385 6434
Data manipulation score 12323 11061
Photo editing score 24230 18842
Writing score 16664 15053
Phones tested 4 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Basiks)AnTuTu 111227101
Add View all (87)
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (shu-)AnTuTu 111126520
Add View all (89)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510		 2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1306 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 3 7
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 384 448
FLOPS 1003 Gigaflops 759.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 Exynos 5300g
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2022 October 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9925 GS201 (S5P9855)
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
311 (63.3%)
180 (36.7%)
Total votes: 491

Related Comparisons

1. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
2. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
4. Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (8)
5. Google Tensor G2 vs Google Tensor G4
6. Google Tensor G2 vs Google Tensor (11)
7. Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (10)
8. Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9. Google Tensor G2 vs Google Tensor G3 (6)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Vipin June 21, 2023 at 06:25 AM
I'd primarily choose Google for its stock software. While Samsung does offer 10-15% extra performance on paper, as a traditional Samsung user, I know their OS comes with a lot of bloatware. So, in my opinion, Google's TG2 should still perform better, and the quick updates make it an ideal choice for me. However, gamers might prefer Samsung. I don't play games, so the TG2 should be more than sufficient for me.
+60 Reply
EnglishРусский