Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 865
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Higher GPU frequency (~2.2x)
- Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
- Shows significantly better (up to 47%) AnTuTu 11 score β 1434K vs 978K
- Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 472427 | 385127 |
| GPU | 390230 | 148169 |
| Memory | 216173 | 166070 |
| UX | 355339 | 279544 |
| Total score | 1434169 | 978910 |
| Samples | [52 tests] | [104 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 169.2 MB/sec | 149.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 103 pages/sec | 87.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 133.7 Mpixels/sec | 125.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 101.3 images/sec | 77 images/sec |
| HDR | 130.8 Mpixels/sec | 106.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 14.7 images/sec | 11 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 34.9 images/sec | 32.7 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.65 Mpixels/sec | 4.29 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 25 tests | 52 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 14.6 images/sec | 4.53 images/sec |
| Face detection | 9.75 images/sec | 1.97 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.41 Gpixels/sec | 0.17 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.36 Gpixels/sec | 0.22 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.48 Gpixels/sec | 0.18 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 38.1 Gpixels/sec | 9.05 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 1860.5 FPS | 567.3 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | OpenCL |
| Samples | 14 tests | 34 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 900 | - |
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 3972 | - |
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 18 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 12 FPS | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 1918 | 1110 |
| Stability | 64% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 6 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11932 | 9557 |
| Video editing score | 7385 | 5874 |
| Data manipulation score | 12323 | 8658 |
| Photo editing score | 24230 | 29642 |
| Writing score | 16664 | 14782 |
| Phones tested | 4 models | 14 models |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 61 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 2200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | Geekbench 6 GPU | 10630 |
| π 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik)) | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-09 (Hangal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1587642 |
| π 2026-09-09 (Basiks) | AnTuTu 11 | 1227101 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-22 (mptech) | AnTuTu 11 | 995050 |
| π 2026-09-20 (mptech) | AnTuTu 11 | 973656 |
| π 2026-09-18 (heedneas) | AnTuTu 12 | 1160558 |
| π 2026-09-18 (Baz38) | AnTuTu 12 | 1001992 |
| π 2026-09-17 (heedneas) | AnTuTu 12 | 1160558 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 865CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz β Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz β Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz β Cortex-A510 |
1x 2.84 GHz β Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz β Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz β Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 10.3 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 7 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 650 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 1306 MHz | 587 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3 | 3 |
| Shading units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shaders | 384 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 1003 Gigaflops | 901.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 698 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gb/s | 44 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300 | X55 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 22 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 Mbps | Up to 7500 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps | Up to 3000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | December 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9925 | SM8250-AB |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site |
| Successor | - Samsung Exynos 2500 | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 721