Exynos 9610 vs Exynos 1280

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9610 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Exynos 1280 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9610
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Performs 5.6x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 10 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 69%) AnTuTu 11 score – 615K vs 365K
  • Supports 43% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 11.9 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
365008
615425
CPU 149165 256114
GPU 18580 71758
Memory 94830 95251
UX 102433 192302
Total score 365008 615425
Samples [11 tests] [56 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 1280 +158%
956
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 1280 +104%
2082
Asset compression 69.3 MB/sec 102.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 32.1 pages/sec 52.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 38.8 Mpixels/sec 71.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 10.7 images/sec 37 images/sec
HDR 43.1 Mpixels/sec 68.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.42 images/sec 6.2 images/sec
Photo processing 6.67 images/sec 16.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.55 Mpixels/sec 3.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
2321
Background blur 2.39 images/sec 3.25 images/sec
Face detection 1.38 images/sec 1.62 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.95 Gpixels/sec 7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 191 FPS 408.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 226
Stability - 95%
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 628
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
Web score 5152 9628
Video editing score 5186 7350
Data manipulation score 5338 8838
Photo editing score 9306 22696
Writing score 6344 13552
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9610
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Gadji TΓ¦mΓ¦v)AnTuTu 11372305
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (A50M Max πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡·)AnTuTu 11380008
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-23 (Muhammed tech)AnTuTu 11368004
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (A50M max)Geekbench 6 CPU374 / 1132
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (A50M max)AnTuTu 11365008
Samsung Exynos 1280
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (eimakill)AnTuTu 12709508
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SacredGold14Geekbench 6 CPU856 / 2016
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (Adi)AnTuTu 11598004
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (DJ)AnTuTu 11651423
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien)AnTuTu 11637428

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9610 and Exynos 1280

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 10 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 1053 MHz 897 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 12 32
Total shaders 36 128
FLOPS 40.8 Gigaflops 229.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 4.3 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 11.9 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 2550 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced March 2018 March 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9610 S5E8825
Official page Samsung Exynos 9610 official site Samsung Exynos 1280 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Samsung Exynos 1580

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
25 (13.3%)
163 (86.7%)
Total votes: 188

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1280 and Exynos 9610, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!