Exynos 9611 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 9611 (Mali-G72 MP3) with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Performs 9.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 12.8 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.5x) AnTuTu 11 score – 895K vs 355K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~32%)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2490 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
A12 Bionic +152%
895627
CPU 146634 309104
GPU 30478 144993
Memory 82437 139578
UX 95802 301952
Total score 355351 895627
Samples [17 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A12 Bionic +261%
1318
Multi-Core Score
A12 Bionic +183%
3134
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A12 Bionic +434%
7868
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 608.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 9 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1482
Stability - 65%
Graphics test - 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 5186 -
Video editing score 5099 -
Data manipulation score 4791 -
Photo editing score 10017 -
Writing score 6916 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu298360
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (14burgos)AnTuTu393276
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (Robiz)AnTuTu302904
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1GeekBench CPU1344 / 4757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Π”ΠΈΠΌΠ°)AnTuTu644981
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386GeekBench GPU7868
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386GeekBench CPU1306 / 2770
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2300 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 12 64
Total shaders 36 256
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAC‑LC
- AAX ΠΈ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HE‑AAC
- HE‑AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2019 September 2018
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E9611 APL1W81
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
51 (16.7%)
255 (83.3%)
Total votes: 306

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!