Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 778G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (Adreno 642). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Performs 9.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 355K
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 12.8 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 10 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
355351
783606
CPU 146634 326426
GPU 30478 101452
Memory 82437 119484
UX 95802 236244
Total score 355351 783606
Samples [17 tests] [113 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1017
Multi-Core Score
2943
Asset compression 69.2 MB/sec 157.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 27.4 pages/sec 70.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 30 Mpixels/sec 113.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 9.76 images/sec 55.4 images/sec
HDR 38.1 Mpixels/sec 91.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.54 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 5.84 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.3 Mpixels/sec 4.17 Mpixels/sec
Samples 13 tests 68 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
2148
Background blur 2.36 images/sec 3.5 images/sec
Face detection 1.43 images/sec 1.57 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.22 Gpixels/sec 5.75 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 145.6 FPS 370.4 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 9 tests 26 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 225
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 686
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12246
Web score 5186 10945
Video editing score 5099 6994
Data manipulation score 4791 9642
Photo editing score 10017 24463
Writing score 6916 14285
Phones tested Less than 3 11 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
59 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
42 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 49 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
94 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 53 FPS
[High]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9611
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Doc)AnTuTu 11352951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Haluk)AnTuTu 11311605
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Aginves)AnTuTu 11357049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (ROBIZ)AnTuTu 11331364
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Somya Lohiya)AnTuTu 11298360
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-29 (igandon9965)AnTuTu 12806268
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 -> AbdullrahmanHAnTuTu 12724653
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Huybu)AnTuTu 12995795
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 -> FlopsAnTuTu 12895764
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 -> DuduSMistrzGeekbench 7 GPU1417

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Snapdragon 778G

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.4-A
L2 cache - 2 MB
Process 10 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Adreno 642
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 850 MHz 550 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 12 256
Total shaders 36 512
FLOPS 61.2 Gigaflops 563.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 770

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 12.8 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 X53
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2019 May 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 SM7325
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1680 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
55 (9.4%)
529 (90.6%)
Total votes: 584

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 778G and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anonymous December 7, 2021 at 08:37 PM
Download and upload speed on the Snapdragon should be faster than this. C'mon Qualcomm!
+21 Reply