Exynos 9810 vs A12 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 9810 (Mali-G72 MP18) with the newer 6-core Apple A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810
  • Has 2 more cores
  • 16% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2490 MHz)
Pros of Apple A12 Bionic
  • Performs 2.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2x)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 51%) AnTuTu 11 score – 895K vs 594K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
  • Supports 19% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 28.7 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
594285
A12 Bionic +51%
895627
CPU 257526 309104
GPU 87627 144993
Memory 115805 139578
UX 133327 301952
Total score 594285 895627
Samples [43 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A12 Bionic +77%
1318
Multi-Core Score
A12 Bionic +68%
3134
Asset compression 123.7 MB/sec 116.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.4 pages/sec 59.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 84.8 Mpixels/sec 71.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 18.8 images/sec 23.7 images/sec
HDR 82.6 Mpixels/sec 98.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.01 images/sec 11.2 images/sec
Photo processing 23.3 images/sec 36.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.31 Mpixels/sec 3.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 14 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A12 Bionic +64%
7868
Background blur 8.29 images/sec 16.1 images/sec
Face detection 4.41 images/sec 19.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.8 Gpixels/sec 24.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 655.7 FPS 608.2 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 10 tests Less than 3
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1482
Stability - 65%
Graphics test - 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 5601 -
Video editing score 5488 -
Data manipulation score 5650 -
Photo editing score 9525 -
Writing score 6250 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 -> skaeleAnTuTu635840
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)GeekBench GPU4587
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)GeekBench CPU495 / 1924
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Alex)AnTuTu614327
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 -> leguskAnTuTu653076
Apple A12 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> op1GeekBench CPU1344 / 4757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Π”ΠΈΠΌΠ°)AnTuTu644981
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386GeekBench GPU7868
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-27 -> USAball386GeekBench CPU1306 / 2770
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-12 -> GiahuyAnTuTu756483

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2900 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 5.3 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 572 MHz 1125 MHz
Pipelines 18 4
Shading units 12 64
Total shaders 216 256
FLOPS 247.1 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.7 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAC‑LC
- AAX ΠΈ AAX+
- Apple Lossless
- HE‑AAC
- HE‑AAC v2
- Linear PCM
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 360 Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced January 2018 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9810 APL1W81
Official page Samsung Exynos 9810 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
90 (40.7%)
131 (59.3%)
Total votes: 221

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!