Exynos 9810 vs Exynos 2200

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9810 (with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics) and Exynos 2200 (Samsung Xclipse 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Performs 4.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 10 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.4x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 594K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.3x)
  • Supports 78% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 28.7 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
594285
Exynos 2200 +141%
1434169
CPU 257526 472427
GPU 87627 390230
Memory 115805 216173
UX 133327 355339
Total score 594285 1434169
Samples [43 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +113%
1588
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +112%
3958
Asset compression 123.7 MB/sec 169.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.4 pages/sec 103 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 84.8 Mpixels/sec 133.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 18.8 images/sec 101.3 images/sec
HDR 82.6 Mpixels/sec 130.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.01 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 23.3 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.31 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 14 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +110%
10088
Background blur 8.29 images/sec 14.6 images/sec
Face detection 4.41 images/sec 9.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.48 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.8 Gpixels/sec 38.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 655.7 FPS 1860.5 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 900
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3972
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 15 FPS
Section 1 - 18 FPS
Section 2 - 15 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1918
Stability - 64%
Graphics test - 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 2200 +112%
13460
Web score 5601 11932
Video editing score 5488 7385
Data manipulation score 5650 12323
Photo editing score 9525 24230
Writing score 6250 16664
Phones tested 3 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 9810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-25 (Denislav Antimov)AnTuTu 11575109
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (Glebby)AnTuTu 12689294
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Ibzz)AnTuTu 12612773
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (s9)AnTuTu 12744869
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 -> skaeleAnTuTu 11635840
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (abd eljalil)AnTuTu 121348187
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> MihneaGeekbench 7 CPU1390 / 3641
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 -> MihneaAnTuTu 121661485
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 -> PixelixAnTuTu 121820994
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-21 -> PixelixAnTuTu 121786295

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Exynos 2200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 10 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 5.3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP18 Samsung Xclipse 920
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen RDNA 2
GPU frequency 572 MHz 1306 MHz
Pipelines 18 3
Shading units 12 128
Total shaders 216 384
FLOPS 247.1 Gigaflops 1003 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.7 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 360 Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2018 January 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9810 S5E9925
Official page Samsung Exynos 9810 official site Samsung Exynos 2200 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
17 (30.9%)
38 (69.1%)
Total votes: 55

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2200 and Exynos 9810, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!