Exynos 990 vs Snapdragon 720G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (Adreno 618). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Supports 195% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 75%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 517K
  • Performs 53% better in floating-point computations
  • 19% higher CPU clock speed (2730 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~11%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +75%
907140
CPU 370196 218272
GPU 130687 50078
Memory 151878 103903
UX 254379 145207
Total score 907140 517460
Samples [50 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +64%
1222
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 990 +74%
3060
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 94.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 45.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 62.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 33.9 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 55.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 5.39 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 15.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 2.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 21 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +333%
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 0.78 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 3.86 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 217.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 8 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 990 +351%
1416
Score 1416 314
Stability 65% 98%
Graphics test 8 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +24%
11402
Web score 10705 8030
Video editing score 6884 6295
Data manipulation score 8823 7577
Photo editing score 30928 18039
Writing score 11422 9464
Phones tested 6 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 43 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 40 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 34 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 30 FPS
[High]
Device - Realme 7 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 -> Jazari28AnTuTu 12993568
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Jadson)AnTuTu 12568523
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (JADSON)AnTuTu 12568523
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Alexander)AnTuTu 12604250
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (masnung08)AnTuTu 12599693
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Aether2005)AnTuTu 11563764

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Snapdragon 720G

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 8 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Adreno 618
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 832 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 11 2
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 352 256
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 384 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 692
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- 384 kHz/32 bit

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 X15
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 15
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 800 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 January 2020
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number S5E9830 SM7125
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
234 (69.6%)
102 (30.4%)
Total votes: 336

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 720G and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!