Exynos 990 vs Exynos 2100

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 10 score – 706K vs 628K
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Performs 36% better in floating-point computations
  • Announced 1-year and 2-months later
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2730 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +12%
706884
628535
CPU 200722 140597
GPU 194919 209723
Memory 132605 134992
UX 175768 139479
Total score 706884 628535

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1366
Multi-Core Score
2674
3362
Asset compression 126.3 MB/sec 146 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 68.4 pages/sec 84.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 90.2 Mpixels/sec 110 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 60.6 images/sec 69.2 images/sec
HDR 88.9 Mpixels/sec 103.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.95 images/sec 10.3 images/sec
Photo processing 21 images/sec 32.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.37 Mpixels/sec 4.24 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +17%
5326
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
4298
5714
Stability 53% 66%
Graphics test 25 FPS 34 FPS
Score 4298 5714

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Exynos 2100

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP 9 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G78 MP14
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 800 MHz 854 MHz
Execution units 11 14
Shading units 64 64
Total shaders 704 896
FLOPS 1126 Gigaflops 1530.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 December 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 S5E9840
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Samsung Exynos 2100 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
165 (10.8%)
1357 (89.2%)
Total votes: 1522

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2100 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
Promotion