Exynos 990 vs Exynos 2100

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Performs 31% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 17%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1065K vs 907K
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2730 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
907140
1065369
CPU 370196 373598
GPU 130687 156133
Memory 151878 227441
UX 254379 308197
Total score 907140 1065369
Samples [50 tests] [40 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1222
1435
Multi-Core Score
3060
3555
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 162 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 104 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 135.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 69.2 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 113 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 11.9 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 4.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5261
6754
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 9.88 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 5.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 21.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 1290.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 8 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 990 +19%
391
Score 391 328
Stability 73% 72%
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1416
1800
Score 1416 1800
Stability 65% 64%
Graphics test 8 FPS 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11402
13533
Web score 10705 13238
Video editing score 6884 7092
Data manipulation score 8823 10433
Photo editing score 30928 29658
Writing score 11422 15614
Phones tested 6 models Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SamsungS8HypeAnTuTu 111236527
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (TimFire)AnTuTu 11868691
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (Chryso27)AnTuTu 11815064
Samsung Exynos 2100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Nurik)AnTuTu 12900228
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luckyy)AnTuTu 121281558
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> fh_hxx19AnTuTu 121191592
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Md. Iqbal Talukder)AnTuTu 111014567

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Exynos 2100

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G78 MP14
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 854 MHz
Pipelines 11 14
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 352 448
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 765.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS 26 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Exynos 5300
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 December 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 S5E9840
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Samsung Exynos 2100 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Samsung Exynos 2500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
183 (10.5%)
1556 (89.5%)
Total votes: 1739

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2100 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!