Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Unisoc T820 vs Snapdragon 695 – what's better?

Unisoc T820 vs Snapdragon 695

Unisoc T820
VS
Snapdragon 695
Unisoc T820
Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc T820 (with Mali-G57 MP4 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (5)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Unisoc T820
  • Shows better (up to 28%) AnTuTu 11 score – 757K vs 592K
  • 23% higher CPU clock speed (2700 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Unisoc T820
vs
Snapdragon 695

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Unisoc T820 +28%
757199
Snapdragon 695
592015
CPU 262223 237904
GPU 57118 56314
Memory 290052 136317
UX 147806 161480
Total score 757199 592015
Samples [3 tests] [83 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Unisoc T820 +14%
2392
Snapdragon 695
2101
Asset compression 117.9 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 56.1 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 86.2 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41.5 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 68.5 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 20.9 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.5 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Unisoc T820 +59%
2236
Snapdragon 695
1403
Background blur 3.32 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 1.59 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 6.45 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 390.3 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 205 -
Stability 96% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 360
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Unisoc T820 +34%
12740
Snapdragon 695
9496
Web score 13579 9704
Video editing score 7072 3911
Data manipulation score 8739 8663
Photo editing score 25271 18151
Writing score 15437 13129
Phones tested Less than 3 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc T820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-29 (Ануар)AnTuTu 11522607
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-21 (Hakuna matata)AnTuTu 11757199
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-09 (FilmEXETH)Geekbench 6 GPU2236
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-09 (FilmEXETH)Geekbench 6 CPU885 / 2392
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-20 (Chico Fico)Geekbench 6 GPU2228
Add View all (6)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Unisoc T820 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2700 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP4 Adreno 619
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 780 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 4 2
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 128 256
FLOPS 199.7 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 32 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3440 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Makalu IVY510 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2022 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - SM6375
Official page Unisoc T820 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
452 (73.9%)
160 (26.1%)
Total votes: 612

Related Comparisons

1. Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (8)
2. Unisoc T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3. Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (1)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Unisoc T820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
sheeesh March 26, 2025 at 05:37 PM
that's odd, i check other websites regarding sd 695 vs unisoc t9100 (t820) and 695 has better quality and better choice than unisoc and yet as we can see here, overall, unisoc is clearly better than 695
+4 Reply
Avatar
CPU Geeky January 12, 2024 at 06:34 AM
To those who are wondering about Unisoc's T820 performance, I have used the Nubia Neo 5G for a month as a review unit, and it's really nailing it for the price-to-performance ratio. It can run these AAA games: CODM: Medium Ultra frames- (58-60fps) Genshin: Mid to High Settings (29-30fps) Tower of Fantasy: Low (30fps) Pokemon Unite: Highest settings (58-60fps) - if medium (60fps) Thermals are good, ranging from 40-42 degrees without fan. Battery life is good too.
+43 Reply
Avatar
Derren October 11, 2024 at 08:10 AM
Really CODM 60 FPS?? Nice chipset
+4 Reply
Avatar
Opoooont March 30, 2025 at 09:37 AM
What? CODM only support medium graphics and high frame rate (40fps BR)...While SD 695 can deliver High Graphics at Max Frame Rate (60fps BR)...even Helio G95 has High graphics and max frame rate...even though it's a slower than T820 since it has more powerful GPU
0 Reply
Avatar
Techy3.0 (Mediatek) September 11, 2023 at 02:12 PM
Unisoc is all the way a better ISP and the best budget-friendly midrange chipset.
+74 Reply
EnglishРусский