Tiger T610 vs Helio G95

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T610 (with Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G95 (Mali-G76 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 67%) AnTuTu 11 score – 535K vs 320K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (2050 vs 1820 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
320967
Helio G95 +67%
535127
CPU 131837 198562
GPU 36139 57845
Memory 60405 113958
UX 92586 164762
Total score 320967 535127
Samples Less than 3 [24 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G95 +61%
672
Multi-Core Score
1305
Helio G95 +46%
1908
Asset compression 72.2 MB/sec 93.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 36.6 pages/sec 50.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 49.3 Mpixels/sec 71.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 22.6 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 40.5 Mpixels/sec 61 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 3.17 images/sec 5.29 images/sec
Photo processing 10.8 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.01 Mpixels/sec 2.86 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 16 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G95 +181%
2137
Background blur 1.27 images/sec 3.45 images/sec
Face detection 0.78 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 2.21 Gpixels/sec 6.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 86.9 FPS 303.4 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples - 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 177
Stability - 95%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 421
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
8150
Helio G95 +3%
8389
Web score 7411 6290
Video editing score 5473 6017
Data manipulation score 6367 6984
Photo editing score 15474 17761
Writing score 8537 9390
Phones tested - 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 57 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 48 FPS
[High]
Genshin Impact - 27 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 52 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Realme 7
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc Tiger T610
No benchmark results yet
MediaTek Helio G95
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Nurbakhyt)AnTuTu 12590155
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (rejaulakash)AnTuTu 11545523
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Rey Firmansyah)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 1754
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Stoic-saint)AnTuTu 11502377
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-24 (alvyan)AnTuTu 11545793

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T610 and Helio G95

CPU

Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 1820 MHz 2050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G76 MP4
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 614 MHz 900 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 24 24
Total shaders 48 96
FLOPS 58.9 Gigaflops 172.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) No MediaTek APU
NPU theoretical performance - 1 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17.1 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 10 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced June 2019 September 2020
Class Low end Mid range
Model number - MT6785V/CD
Official page - MediaTek Helio G95 official site
Successor - Unisoc Tiger T612 - MediaTek Helio G99

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
6 (27.3%)
16 (72.7%)
Total votes: 22

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G95 and Tiger T610, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!