Xring O1 vs Exynos 2500
We compared two 10-core processors: Xiaomi Xring O1 (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 graphics) and Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
- Higher GPU frequency (~39%)
- Performs 39% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 29%) AnTuTu 11 score β 2963K vs 2289K
- 18% higher CPU clock speed (3900 vs 3300 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 937172 | 771016 |
| GPU | 996086 | 723824 |
| Memory | 409648 | 356421 |
| UX | 620146 | 438435 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 2289696 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [8 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 332.8 MB/sec | 390.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 236.9 pages/sec | 179.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 266 Mpixels/sec | 218.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 208.8 images/sec | 247.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 262.9 Mpixels/sec | 309 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 32.7 images/sec | 36.4 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 80.1 images/sec | 89.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 8.25 Mpixels/sec | 12.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 4 tests | Less than 3 |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 42.3 images/sec | 35.4 images/sec |
| Face detection | 14.3 images/sec | 15.1 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.9 Gpixels/sec | 0.45 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 1.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 1.72 Gpixels/sec | 1.6 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | 0.23 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 71.6 Gpixels/sec | 82.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 2977 FPS | 3446.8 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | Vulkan |
| Samples | 4 tests | 2 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 2413 | 2231 |
| Stability | 92% | 54% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 9022 | 9397 |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| Section 3 | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 5832 | - |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | - |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17566 | 15720 |
| Video editing score | 6957 | 8133 |
| Data manipulation score | 15048 | 11954 |
| Photo editing score | 27481 | 32035 |
| Writing score | 19142 | 22532 |
| Phones tested | 3 models | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Xring O1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2842416 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Albert) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21512 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2746 / 8431 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | AnTuTu 11 | 2963052 |
Samsung Exynos 2500
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-16 -> INFC | AnTuTu 11 | 2220403 |
| π 2026-01-01 (Koss) | AnTuTu 11 | 2437711 |
| π 2025-12-19 (Yell) | AnTuTu 11 | 2112394 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | Geekbench 6 GPU | 18873 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | AnTuTu 11 | 2496663 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and Exynos 2500CPU
| Architecture | 2x 3.9 GHz β Cortex-X925 4x 3.4 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.9 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.8 GHz β Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.3 GHz β Cortex-X925 2x 2.74 GHz β Cortex-A725 5x 2.36 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.8 GHz β Cortex-A520 |
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 16 MB |
| Process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 19 billion | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| Architecture | Valhall 5th gen | RDNA 3 |
| GPU frequency | 1392 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 2048 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 Gigaflops | 4091.9 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| NPU theoretical performance | 44 TOPS | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5T | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 4800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s | 76.8 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max display resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | - | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | Exynos 5400 |
| 4G support | - | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7900 Mbps | Up to 12100 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 4200 Mbps | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2025 | June 2025 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | - | S5E9955 |
| Official page | - | Samsung Exynos 2500 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 210
