AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon RX Vega 6 with 6 pipelines and 384 shaders against the 2 years and 7 months newer Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) that utilizes 80 pipelines and 640 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) over RX Vega 6
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX Vega 6
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 7 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
  • 36% higher maximum theoretical performance (1.9 vs 1.4 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 76% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (14K vs 8K)
  • Has 67% more shading units (640 vs 384)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
13
-
-
-
21
10
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
12
9
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
19
13
10
-
16
11
9
-
Far Cry 6
12
9
-
-
13
10
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy -
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
16
11
10
-
12
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
9
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
11
10
-
-
12
12
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 11 12
1080p Ultra - 9
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Medium

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 839 1230
Fire Strike 2697 4196
Wild Life Extreme 1635 2124
Night Raid 11031 15167
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 17.6 img/sec 31 img/sec
Face Detection 9.06 img/sec 23.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.61 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 0.87 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.38 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 27.6 Gpixels/sec 36.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 879 FPS 2493.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 329 392
DirectX 11 9 FPS 16 FPS
DirectX 12 6 FPS 12 FPS
GPU Compute 647 Ops/s 1158 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 495 & 69410 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 986 1149
Image Segmentation (HP) 1173 1796
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2200 1394
Face Detection (HP) 2979 2775
Pose Estimation (Q) 6497 5476
Text Classification (SP) 632 981
Machine Translation (HP) 1306 905
Object Detection (SP) 1093 1277
Depth Estimation (Q) 3935 3737
Style Transfer (SP) 13291 22348
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX Vega 6 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released February 1, 2018 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture GCN 5.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Raven Tiger Lake GT2
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 4600H or above - Intel Core i5 1130G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 3 7330U
- AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
- AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
- Intel Core 5 220U
- Intel Core 5 220H
- Intel Core i5 1334U
- Intel Core 5 120U
- Intel Core i5 1335U
- Intel Core i5 1345U
- Intel Core i5 1340P
- Intel Core i5 13500H
- and 14 more
Laptop GPU ranking (124th and 134th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1100-1800 MHz (configurable) 850-1500 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 384 640
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 24 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 20
Compute Units (Pipelines) 6 80
Tensor Cores No No
Ray-tracing Cores No No
L2 Cache - 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 9-14 GPixel/s 17-30 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 26-43 GTexel/s 34-60 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.8-1.4 TFLOPS
1.1-1.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface IGP Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 7 nm 10 nm
Die Size 210 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 4.94 billion -
Transistor Density 23.52 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
8 (44.4%)
10 (55.6%)
Total votes: 18

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Yep May 7, 2025 at 08:16 AM
Battle of the titans.. (Though iris xe may be better in real world use) Ryzen took the battery effeciency
0 Reply