Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 1200 vs A14 Bionic – what's better?

Dimensity 1200 vs A14 Bionic

Dimensity 1200
VS
A14 Bionic
Dimensity 1200
A14 Bionic

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9) with the older 6-core Apple A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of Apple A14 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~44%)
  • Shows better (up to 38%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1326K vs 960K
  • Performs 28% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 1200
vs
A14 Bionic

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 1200
960724
A14 Bionic +38%
1326975
CPU 384772 364692
GPU 144433 311592
Memory 177452 180518
UX 254067 470169
Total score 960724 1326975
Samples [12 tests] [55 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Dimensity 1200
1143
A14 Bionic +83%
2095
Multi-Core Score
Dimensity 1200
3353
A14 Bionic +58%
5297
Asset compression 168.6 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 95.8 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 131.1 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 71.4 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 117.3 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 32.4 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.54 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Dimensity 1200
4595
A14 Bionic +266%
16822
Background blur 6.87 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 3.39 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 14.4 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 838.9 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 6 tests 17 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 442 -
Stability 96% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2767
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Section 1 - 13 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Dimensity 1200
1311
A14 Bionic +70%
2229
Score 1311 2229
Stability 79% 86%
Graphics test 7 FPS 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9284 -
Video editing score 6385 -
Data manipulation score 10275 -
Photo editing score 25491 -
Writing score 14338 -
Phones tested 2 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 68 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[High]		 -
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 71 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 88 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 51 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekbench 6 CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu 11960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu 11773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu 11961761
Add View all (21)
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-13 (Barelpunch)AnTuTu 111200682
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Z0tacxyz)AnTuTu 111294739
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Timur)AnTuTu 111199214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (kudryash)AnTuTu 111196958
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Stelle)AnTuTu 111288870
Add View all (80)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 1200 and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3000 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 32 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 320 KB 8 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4.3 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP9 Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 886 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 9 4
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 288 256
FLOPS 510.3 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 4.5 TOPS 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Helio M70 -
4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4700 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced January 2021 September 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6893 APL1W01
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
505 (50.2%)
500 (49.8%)
Total votes: 1005

Related Comparisons

1. Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A15 Bionic (37)
2. Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
3. Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9)
4. Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11)
5. Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A13 Bionic (9)
6. Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (56)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (22)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and Dimensity 1200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский