Dimensity 7050 vs Dimensity 1080

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Dimensity 1080 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7050
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 806K vs 731K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
806012
CPU 310680 286757
GPU 80663 76903
Memory 176922 134935
UX 237747 233342
Total score 806012 731937
Samples [29 tests] [58 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 117.2 MB/sec 121.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 61.2 pages/sec 63 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 89.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.8 images/sec 48.6 images/sec
HDR 76.7 Mpixels/sec 81 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.71 images/sec 7.24 images/sec
Photo processing 21.3 images/sec 23.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.21 Mpixels/sec 3.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 18 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.79 images/sec 3.62 images/sec
Face detection 1.88 images/sec 1.73 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7.13 Gpixels/sec 7.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 393.6 FPS 422.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 7 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 233 234
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 631
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9630 10948
Video editing score 5765 7467
Data manipulation score 8000 10634
Photo editing score 28539 18941
Writing score 15985 14594
Phones tested 5 models 4 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 62 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 37 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 86 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Ohm)AnTuTu 12805828
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Thun)AnTuTu 12874833
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (Jedrick)AnTuTu 11843534
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy)AnTuTu 11839005
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Arda1)AnTuTu 11874742
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Ano)Geekbench 6 GPU2720
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Anonymous)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2514
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 -> PolarisDeOstianAnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Polaris)AnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Ditthaze)AnTuTu 11731937

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7050 and Dimensity 1080

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 243.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 MediaTek APU 3.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2023 October 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA MT6877V/TTZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7050 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1080 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2610 (45.3%)
3147 (54.7%)
Total votes: 5757

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1080 and Dimensity 7050, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anonymous September 9, 2026 at 08:32 PM
I guess I found one. As they say: same same, but different
0 Reply
Avatar
Miguel August 2, 2024 at 07:31 AM
They are essentially the same SoC. MediaTek just renamed because of their new naming system it and tweaked the NPU for better AI processing performance
+19 Reply
Avatar
Guest May 3, 2024 at 01:47 PM
I believe you should consider purchasing the Galaxy A34 for $179 USD, rather than spending nearly $300 USD on the Oppo Reno 11. There's no difference in performance. In fact, my Galaxy A34 scored 557k on Antutu.
+35 Reply
Avatar
Lol November 19, 2023 at 06:26 PM
Essentially, the chip is the same, and the GPU difference falls within the margin of error due to varying device cooling, etc.
+78 Reply
Avatar
Basil November 12, 2023 at 07:07 AM
Dimensity just deceived us by reusing an old processor and then changing its name to make it appear as if it were a brand-new processor.
+85 Reply
Avatar
Potato November 3, 2023 at 05:55 AM
Corporate wants you to find the difference between these two SOCs.
+29 Reply
Avatar
Levanliya August 21, 2023 at 04:01 AM
There aren't any different(ce) between 1080 and 7050 unless it's just the number of names.
+138 Reply
Avatar
Asif May 30, 2023 at 07:31 AM
Wtf is mediatek is doing? There is no difference between dimensity 1080 and 7050. I dont know why this chip is even released.
+389 Reply
Avatar
Kan May 17, 2023 at 03:38 PM
I think the rebranding is faking a new processor and using a new naming system (6,7,8,9) at the same time. Suddenly they are reusing the 2021 dimensity 1100.
+73 Reply
Avatar
People May 24, 2023 at 01:58 AM
800 & 900 series renamed to 6000 series 1000 series renamed to 7000 series 8000 and 9000 series are already released for high-end level
+106 Reply
Avatar
whoami May 10, 2023 at 08:32 PM
I can't see the difference. Does anyone know why the 7050 was produced?
+217 Reply
Avatar
farz May 12, 2023 at 06:50 AM
becs these brands make fools of the customers that, they are coming brand new processors. dirty buisiness trick.
+158 Reply
Avatar
Sumanta Mandal June 1, 2023 at 08:25 AM
farz, You are right. Thank God nanoreview help us.
+75 Reply