Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 1080 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 1080

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 1080
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 1080

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 77% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 731K vs 592K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 1080

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695
592015
Dimensity 1080 +24%
731937
CPU 237904 286757
GPU 56314 76903
Memory 136317 134935
UX 161480 233342
Total score 592015 731937
Samples [83 tests] [58 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 121.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 63 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 89.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 48.6 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 81 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 7.24 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 23.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 3.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 25 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 3.62 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.73 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 7.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 422.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 234
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 631
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Dimensity 1080 +25%
11890
Web score 9704 10948
Video editing score 3911 7467
Data manipulation score 8663 10634
Photo editing score 18151 18941
Writing score 13129 14594
Phones tested 21 models 4 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 27 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 62 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 37 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 86 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Dimensity 1080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Ano)Geekbench 6 GPU2720
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Anonymous)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2514
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 -> PolarisDeOstianAnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Polaris)AnTuTu 11780307
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Ditthaze)AnTuTu 11731937
Add View all (92)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 1080

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 3.0

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 October 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6877V/TTZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1080 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
708 (14.8%)
4072 (85.2%)
Total votes: 4780

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Samsung Exynos 1380 (17)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (10)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Helio G99
10. MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (22)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1080 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mr cpu September 1, 2024 at 12:40 PM
Helio g99 is better than snapdragon 695 the difference snapdragon is 5g and the other is 4g when playing games helio g99 is better and faster and doesn t lag as 695
+7 Reply
Avatar
Baka September 23, 2024 at 11:04 AM
"Lol. You're kidding me, Snapdragon 695 is better than Helio G99 and G99 Ultimate - gaming performance? In my test, Helio G99 and G99 Ultimate ran Genshin Impact on high graphics at 10/15 FPS, while Snapdragon 695 ran the same on high graphics at 20/25/30 FPS. Emulation of the Nintendo Switch during the Uzuy test on Snapdragon 695 resulted in the following: Pokemon Legend Arcus: FPS 30 Hatsune Miku Project Diva MM+: FPS 60 Naruto Series 1 to 4: FPS 30 Sniper Elite 3 and 4: FPS 30 Resident Evil 6: FPS 30 And more..."
+8 Reply
Avatar
ANDROID July 11, 2024 at 05:14 AM
Is Dimensity 1080 really 90% faster in GPU?
+17 Reply
Avatar
Unknown August 25, 2024 at 11:47 PM
Yep Since it has 4 cores and more Flops
+7 Reply
EnglishРусский