Snapdragon 782G vs Dimensity 7200

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
  • Performs 27% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~57%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 20%) AnTuTu 11 score – 971K vs 806K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
971424
CPU 326376 362430
GPU 112186 148984
Memory 170913 169068
UX 196945 290942
Total score 806420 971424
Samples [6 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 160.6 MB/sec 127.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 73.7 pages/sec 73.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 112.8 Mpixels/sec 86.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 56.6 images/sec 42.2 images/sec
HDR 95.8 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.8 images/sec 8.69 images/sec
Photo processing 28.9 images/sec 21.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.51 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 5 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 5.06 images/sec
Face detection 1.86 images/sec 2.89 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7.34 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 471.5 FPS 909.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 5 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 269 447
Stability 69% -
Graphics test 2 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1158
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8240 -
Video editing score 5647 -
Data manipulation score 8341 -
Photo editing score 18954 -
Writing score 13368 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (Prashant)AnTuTu 11805122
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-17 (zenith)AnTuTu 11863702
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-14 (kiensec)AnTuTu 11906324
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-29 -> zenithAnTuTu 11806420
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-20 -> Faizan90AnTuTu 11784329
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Vedurijuht2425)AnTuTu 121045921
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu 11980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu 11964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu 111003769
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (note8techh)AnTuTu 11984744

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 782G and Dimensity 7200

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2700 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 719 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 512 256
FLOPS 736.3 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X53 -
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2022 February 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325-AF MT6886
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G official site MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
465 (26.3%)
1303 (73.7%)
Total votes: 1768

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 and Snapdragon 782G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Hater November 8, 2023 at 01:34 PM
Wasn't the 782 made by Samsung?!
+52 Reply
Serhii November 9, 2023 at 07:51 AM
No, it's made by TSMC.
+21 Reply
Avatar
Bilal Hussain Shaikh May 5, 2024 at 07:28 PM
Oops, 7s Gen 2 is made by Samsung, not 782G, my bad
+1 Reply
Avatar
Norman Lee Adante August 2, 2023 at 05:02 PM
My Message to both parties. Compete each other every single time to see who's the best.
+90 Reply
Avatar
GS RUPAL January 31, 2024 at 05:48 AM
I always prefer Snapdragon because I've used both, and the quality/performance of Snapdragon remains much more stable in the long run.
+51 Reply
Avatar
s Khan March 12, 2024 at 09:59 AM
GS RUPAL, Yes, I also prefer Snapdragon because its potential surpasses that of MediaTek.
+21 Reply