Exynos 990 vs Exynos 9810

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 990 (with Mali-G77 MP11 graphics) and Exynos 9810 (Mali-G72 MP18). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 990
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~45%)
  • Supports 53% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 28.7 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 53%) AnTuTu 11 score – 907K vs 594K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2730 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 990 +53%
907140
594285
CPU 370196 257526
GPU 130687 87627
Memory 151878 115805
UX 254379 133327
Total score 907140 594285
Samples [50 tests] [43 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 990 +64%
1222
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 990 +64%
3060
Asset compression 139.9 MB/sec 123.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.6 pages/sec 73.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 99.8 Mpixels/sec 84.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 66.4 images/sec 18.8 images/sec
HDR 98.7 Mpixels/sec 82.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.4 images/sec 7.01 images/sec
Photo processing 30.6 images/sec 23.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.92 Mpixels/sec 3.31 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 990 +10%
5261
Background blur 7.47 images/sec 8.29 images/sec
Face detection 3.84 images/sec 4.41 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.25 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.27 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 16.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 955.5 FPS 655.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 8 tests 10 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 391 -
Stability 73% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1416 -
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 8 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 990 +79%
11402
Web score 10705 5601
Video editing score 6884 5488
Data manipulation score 8823 5650
Photo editing score 30928 9525
Writing score 11422 6250
Phones tested 6 models 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 990
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-03 (Bbbb)AnTuTu 121004097
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-01 (mptech412)AnTuTu 121289329
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 -> Jazari28AnTuTu 12993568
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (ZailoxTM)AnTuTu 121144833
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Tomio.tomato)AnTuTu 121064880
Samsung Exynos 9810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-30 (Levi)AnTuTu 12686392
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-28 (Novel)AnTuTu 12641725
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-25 (Denislav Antimov)AnTuTu 11575109
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (Glebby)AnTuTu 12689294
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Ibzz)AnTuTu 12612773

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 990 and Exynos 9810

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2730 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 5.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G72 MP18
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 2nd gen
GPU frequency 832 MHz 572 MHz
Pipelines 11 18
Shading units 32 12
Total shaders 352 216
FLOPS 585.7 Gigaflops 247.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 15 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 1800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 28.7 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 25MP 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5123 Shannon 360
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2019 January 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9830 S5E9810
Official page Samsung Exynos 990 official site Samsung Exynos 9810 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2200 - Samsung Exynos 2200

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
173 (79.4%)
45 (20.6%)
Total votes: 218

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 9810 and Exynos 990, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!