Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 1200 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 1200

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 1200
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 1200

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1200
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 62%) AnTuTu 11 score – 960K vs 592K
  • 36% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Performs 19% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 1200

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695
592015
Dimensity 1200 +62%
960724
CPU 237904 384772
GPU 56314 144433
Memory 136317 177452
UX 161480 254067
Total score 592015 960724
Samples [83 tests] [12 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 168.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 95.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 131.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 71.4 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 117.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 32.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 4.54 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 695
1403
Dimensity 1200 +228%
4595
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 6.87 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 3.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 14.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 838.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 442
Stability - 96%
Graphics test - 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 1311
Stability 98% 79%
Graphics test 2 FPS 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Dimensity 1200 +24%
11728
Web score 9704 9284
Video editing score 3911 6385
Data manipulation score 8663 10275
Photo editing score 18151 25491
Writing score 13129 14338
Phones tested 21 models 2 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 68 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 60 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 71 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Oppo Realme GT Neo
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Add View all (111)
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekBench GPU4546
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisGeekBench CPU1112 / 3313
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> Kot_LuisAnTuTu960724
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Π’Π°Ρ€Ρ„ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΉ Π˜Π³ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΈΡ‡)AnTuTu773735
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (Bavarik)AnTuTu961761
Add View all (21)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 1200

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 32 KB
L2 cache - 320 KB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4.3 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 886 MHz
Pipelines 2 9
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 288
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 510.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 4.5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Helio M70
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 19
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 January 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6893
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1200 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
100 (14%)
616 (86%)
Total votes: 716

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (2)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (21)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (4)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1200 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский