Exynos 1280 vs Google Tensor

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Higher GPU frequency (~18%)
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Shows significantly better (up to 82%) AnTuTu 9 score – 742K vs 407K
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2400 MHz)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
407590
742651
CPU 121943 196221
GPU 113634 297786
Memory 69031 107096
UX 103890 143527
Total score 407590 742651

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1037
Multi-Core Score
2826
Image compression 116.6 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 13.5 images/s -
Speech recognition 33.1 words/s -
Machine learning 29.3 images/s -
Camera shooting 13.1 images/s -
HTML 5 1.97 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 556.4 Krows/s -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
6275
Stability 99% 55%
Graphics test 13 FPS 37 FPS
Score 2287 6275

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Google Tensor

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache - 3 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP - 10 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G78 MP20
Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
GPU frequency 1000 MHz 848 MHz
Execution units 4 20
Shading units 48 320
FLOPS - 2171 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Tensor Processing Unit
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced March 2022 October 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8825 S5E9845
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site Google Tensor official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
22 (14.6%)
129 (85.4%)
Total votes: 151

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Google Tensor and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
Promotion