Exynos 1280 vs Google Tensor

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Performs 4.7x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 64%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1010K vs 615K
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
615425
1010025
CPU 256114 365546
GPU 71758 169803
Memory 95251 178763
UX 192302 295913
Total score 615425 1010025
Samples [56 tests] [51 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1477
Multi-Core Score
3595
Asset compression 102.4 MB/sec 159.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52.1 pages/sec 97.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.3 Mpixels/sec 138.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37 images/sec 83.4 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 119.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.2 images/sec 14.1 images/sec
Photo processing 16.9 images/sec 30.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec 3.44 Mpixels/sec
Samples 37 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8918
Background blur 3.25 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Face detection 1.62 images/sec 7.31 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.5 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7 Gpixels/sec 39.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 408.3 FPS 1368.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 18 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
704
Score 226 704
Stability 95% 63%
Graphics test 2 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1899
Score 628 1899
Stability 99% 59%
Graphics test 3 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
Web score 9628 7105
Video editing score 7350 5884
Data manipulation score 8838 10310
Photo editing score 22696 19072
Writing score 13552 15550
Phones tested 3 models 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1280
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-19 -> Black_KRGMAnTuTu 12783535
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-10 -> Black_KRGMAnTuTu 12765124
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (James)AnTuTu 11612157
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Smile)AnTuTu 12697936
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (eimakill)AnTuTu 12709508
Google Tensor
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (rulz_103)AnTuTu 121225085
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> Islom_1180AnTuTu 121235821
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Vladi♂️Slave♂️)AnTuTu 121281085
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (duwi)AnTuTu 11774697
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> Paranoid _AntostAnTuTu 11930801

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Google Tensor

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache - 3 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5.6 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G78 MP20
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 897 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 4 20
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 128 640
FLOPS 229.6 Gigaflops 1085.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Tensor Processing Unit
NPU theoretical performance 4.3 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5300b
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced March 2022 October 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8825 GS101 (S5P9845)
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site Google Tensor official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
34 (13.8%)
213 (86.2%)
Total votes: 247

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Google Tensor and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Rohit April 25, 2025 at 06:19 PM
Best processor 😁 for google
0 Reply