Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 1080

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (Mali-G68 MC4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1080
  • Shows better (up to 29%) AnTuTu 9 score – 525K vs 407K
  • Announced 7-months later
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2400 MHz)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
407590
525002
CPU 121943 142334
GPU 113634 140609
Memory 69031 108237
UX 103890 139021
Total score 407590 525002

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2278
Image compression 116.6 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 13.5 images/s -
Speech recognition 33.1 words/s -
Machine learning 29.3 images/s -
Camera shooting 13.1 images/s -
HTML 5 1.97 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 556.4 Krows/s -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 13 FPS 13 FPS
Score 2287 2287

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Dimensity 1080

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G68 MC4
Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
GPU frequency 1000 MHz -
Execution units 4 4
Shading units 48 64
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 3.0
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 -
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1840 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced March 2022 October 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8825 MT6877V/TTZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site MediaTek Dimensity 1080 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
122 (24.2%)
383 (75.8%)
Total votes: 505

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1080 and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
Avatar
Javier 24 March 2023 16:29
Exynos consumes less battery
0 Reply
Avatar
Decay 25 February 2023 10:22
Dimensity 1080 would annihilate Exynos 1280 in multi-core performance and efficiency.
+27 Reply
Avatar
Tom 24 February 2023 00:35
Exynos processors optimization is really bad and this causes lag in normal use. So this is a very serious problem.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Illidan 18 January 2023 18:50
Main difference is LPDDR5 RAM.
+34 Reply
Promotion