Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 8100

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (Mali-G610 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  • Supports 201% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 78%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1092K vs 615K
  • 19% higher CPU clock speed (2850 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
615425
1092605
CPU 256114 408979
GPU 71758 172618
Memory 95251 201895
UX 192302 309113
Total score 615425 1092605
Samples [56 tests] [52 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1139
Multi-Core Score
3842
Asset compression 102.4 MB/sec 181.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52.1 pages/sec 108.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.3 Mpixels/sec 134.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37 images/sec 88.6 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 131.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.2 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 16.9 images/sec 32.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec 4.87 Mpixels/sec
Samples 37 tests 19 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
3924
Background blur 3.25 images/sec 4.92 images/sec
Face detection 1.62 images/sec 2.66 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7 Gpixels/sec 9.79 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 408.3 FPS 849.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 18 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
564
Score 226 564
Stability 95% 92%
Graphics test 2 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1540
Score 628 1540
Stability 99% 91%
Graphics test 3 FPS 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
11862
Web score 9628 11581
Video editing score 7350 7037
Data manipulation score 8838 8309
Photo editing score 22696 19759
Writing score 13552 16904
Phones tested 3 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 77 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends - 74 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 98 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1280
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (eimakill)AnTuTu 12709508
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SacredGold14Geekbench 6 CPU856 / 2016
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (Adi)AnTuTu 11598004
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (DJ)AnTuTu 11651423
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien)AnTuTu 11637428
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Gelu)AnTuTu 111054060
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Zuma)AnTuTu 111171695
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (CrysTalesia)AnTuTu 111125997
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (bbgsqq)AnTuTu 111213935
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 -> Tem4kAnTuTu 111120838

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Dimensity 8100

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 Mali-G610 MP6
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 897 MHz 860 MHz
Pipelines 4 6
Shading units 32 64
Total shaders 128 384
FLOPS 229.6 Gigaflops 660.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 580
NPU theoretical performance 4.3 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek UltraSave 2.0
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 March 2022
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8825 MT6895Z/TCZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8100:
    - There are "Max" and "Ultra" versions which are basically all the same. The Dimensity 8100 Ultra features optimized software, while the Dimensity 8100 Max boosts the clock from 2.85 GHz to 2.9 GHz.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
34 (11.8%)
254 (88.2%)
Total votes: 288

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8100 and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!