Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Adreno X1-85
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Coffee Lake GT2
Adreno X1-85
Adreno X1
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel UHD Graphics 630 with 24 pipelines and 192 shaders against the 5 years and 7 months newer Adreno X1-85 that utilizes 6 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-85
- Performs significantly better (up to 6.1x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 9.2x higher maximum theoretical performance (4.6 vs 0.5 TFLOPS)
- Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
- Achieves 4.2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (24K vs 5K)
- Has 8x more shading units (1536 vs 192)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10 - - - |
- |
| The Witcher 3 | - - - - |
- |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12 - - - |
- |
| 1080p High | - | - |
| 1080p Ultra | - | - |
| 1440p Ultra | - | - |
| 4K Ultra | - | - |
| Margin of Error | High | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 438 | 1695 |
| Solar Bay | - | 10596 |
| Fire Strike | 1328 | 6134 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 762 | 6152 |
| Night Raid | 5037 | 28868 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 11.2 img/sec | 36.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 6.77 img/sec | 17.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 0.21 Gpixels/sec | 1.19 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 0.31 Gpixels/sec | 1.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | 1.42 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.08 Gpixels/sec | 0.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 21.4 Gpixels/sec | 72.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 794.3 FPS | 4692.5 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 292 | 518 |
| DirectX 11 | 10 FPS | 19 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 5 FPS | 10 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 495 Ops/s | 1958 Ops/s |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | - | 1347 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | - | 2661 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | - | 3084 |
| Face Detection (HP) | - | 5354 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | - | 7719 |
| Text Classification (SP) | - | 292 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | - | 1108 |
| Object Detection (SP) | - | 660 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | - | 3876 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | - | 12048 |
| Framework | - | ONNX |
| Backend | - | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Adreno X1-85General
| Vendor | Intel | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | April 3, 2018 | October 24, 2023 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Adreno X1 |
| GPU Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Adreno X1 |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) |
| Successor | - Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU) | - Adreno X2-90 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i5 8300H or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - Intel Core i7 10870H - Intel Core i9 10885H - Intel Core i9 10850K - Intel Core i5 10500T - Intel Core i5 10300H - Intel Core i7 9700T - Intel Core i5 9500T - Intel Core i3 9100T - and 38 more |
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-66-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-80-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (138th and 112th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000-1250 MHz (configurable) | 1200-1500 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 24 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 3 | 48 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 24 | 6 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | - | No |
| L1 Cache | - | 192KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | - | 1MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 3-4 GPixel/s | 58-72 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 24-30 GTexel/s | 115-144 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| TGP | 15 W | 30 W |
| Manufacturing | Intel | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | - |
| Transistor Count | 0.19 billion | - |
| Transistor Density | 3.88 MTr/mm² | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Size | System RAM Dependent | - |
| Memory Clock | System RAM Dependent | - |
| Effective Memory Speed | System RAM Dependent | - |
| ECC | No | - |
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | - | No |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 1.2 | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2