Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU) vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU) with 32 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 1 year and 5 months older Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) that utilizes 96 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) over UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU)
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 83%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 3x higher maximum theoretical performance (2.4 vs 0.8 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (17K vs 8K)
  • Has 3x more shading units (768 vs 256)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
14
-
-
-
21
11
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
12
11
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
13
-
-
-
19
12
9
-
Far Cry 6
-
-
-
-
14
11
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy -
9
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
14
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077 -
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
15
13
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 14
1080p Ultra - 10
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 670 1282
Fire Strike 2365 4411
Wild Life Extreme 1619 3119
Night Raid 9688 14097
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 18.6 img/sec 34.5 img/sec
Face Detection 12.1 img/sec 27.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.75 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.53 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 20.8 Gpixels/sec 55.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 1203.8 FPS 3061.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU)
No benchmark results yet
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekBench16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekBench15810

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 765 1428
Image Segmentation (HP) 1214 2420
Image Super Resolution (Q) 981 1551
Face Detection (HP) 1893 3685
Pose Estimation (Q) 3752 6255
Text Classification (SP) 847 938
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 1028
Object Detection (SP) 866 1581
Depth Estimation (Q) 2410 4305
Style Transfer (SP) 11417 26119
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2022 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.2 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Alder Lake GT1 Tiger Lake GT2
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX Vega 7 -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 11500H or above - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 3 N355
- Intel Core i7 12650HX
- Intel Core i9 14900HX
- Intel Core i3 N300
- Intel Processor N200
- Intel Core i3 N305
- Intel Core i9 13900HX
- Intel Core i7 11850H
- and 4 more
- Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
Laptop GPU ranking (131st and 123rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1450-1650 MHz (configurable) 950-1550 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 256 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 24
Compute Units (Pipelines) 32 96
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores No -
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 12-13 GPixel/s 23-37 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 23-26 GTexel/s 46-74 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.7-0.8 TFLOPS
1.5-2.4 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing Intel Intel
Fabrication Process 10 nm 10 nm
Die Size - 146 mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 2.1
Ray Tracing No No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
4 (50%)
4 (50%)
Total votes: 8

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!